Working can be one of the sweetest experiences if we have a good coworker. Due to we have to spend a lot of time with that. one of the crucial characteristics that a coworker has to have is a willingness to learn. I have several reasons why I feel like this that I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, in today's rapidly changing world, it is necessary to learn new skills and techniques that lead us to do projects in the best way and help us to find out novel methods. The consequence of that is doing tasks with better results; it also provides opportunities to detect new methods to achieve success. My personal example is one of the compelling examples of this. At university, we had to do our final project in a group; we had to extract a soil sample, but we forgot to carry special equipment to cut the soil; one of my coworkers strived to find another method to excavate the soil, and she finally was successful. The work had been done thanks to the eager colleague, and had she not been with us, we would have had serious problems.
Secondly, we will become more knowledgeable if we have an eager learning colleague; actually, this trait will convey to us. Hence we can learn about the methods that he or she is using, and during a positive competition, we look forward to learning new things because we spend a lot of time with him or her; this trait will become consistent in our personality. For instance, three years ago, I had a coworker that he was really willing to learn. He always asked about different ways and new methods and tried to update. I spent time with him, and finally, I tried to be like him, so I am guessing that I fell behind him, and now I try to learn every new knowledge.
In a nutshell, I entirely believe that willing to learn new things is an important hallmark of a good coworker that can improve our personality and make our convenient tasks. We spend much time during the day with them; as a result of this, they can affect us in various aspects.
- Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five should not be allowed Do you agree or disagree with this idea Explain it by giving specific examples 76
- TOEFL ESSAY Many families have important traditions that family members share What is one of your family s important traditions 76
- Some people prefer to take a position in a Company and work for the Company Other people think it is better to go into business for themselves Which do you think is better Give reasons and examples to support your response 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When people succeed it is entirely because of hard work Luck has nothing to do with their success Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 80
- Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five should not be allowed Do you agree or disagree with this idea Explain it by giving specific examples 83
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
... have to spend a lot of time with that. one of the crucial characteristics that a c...
^^^
Line 2, column 148, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help us find' instead.
Suggestion: help us find
...d us to do projects in the best way and help us to find out novel methods. The consequence of t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 125, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...actually, this trait will convey to us. Hence we can learn about the methods that he ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, hence, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, as to, for instance, i feel, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.40860215054 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60237269113 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518817204301 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6110057924 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.45110844103 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201877214885 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719023722053 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422999150462 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136196460307 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357031949432 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
... have to spend a lot of time with that. one of the crucial characteristics that a c...
^^^
Line 2, column 148, Rule ID: HELP_TO_FIND[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'help us find' instead.
Suggestion: help us find
...d us to do projects in the best way and help us to find out novel methods. The consequence of t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 125, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...actually, this trait will convey to us. Hence we can learn about the methods that he ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, hence, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, as to, for instance, i feel, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.40860215054 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60237269113 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518817204301 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6110057924 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 5.45110844103 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201877214885 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719023722053 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422999150462 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136196460307 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357031949432 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.