is taking a lot of time making an important decision a good guality or a bad one
While many may argue that a timely and fast decision is inclined to result in better outcomes collectively, opponents might claim that analyzing every aspect of a decision for a long period is the more cautious and subsequently, the more successful path. I, however, agree with the former, and I believe that an effective decision must be on time as well as accurate to serve its purpose adequately. I will elaborate further as follows.
First, time is a valuable gem in the possession of everyone equally. However, people employ different approaches regarding the use of this precious resource. In my opinion, delays in making important decisions not only harm a person regarding the potential risk of losing their opportunities, but they can also cause the loss of very essential amenity, time. Additionally, I believe the waste of time is a greater loss than making the wrong decision, in many cases. There can be no wrong pathways, and even those that may seem faulty as well can provide numerous beneficial life lessons. For instance, my brother was offered a job as a remote translator while he was a student in college. He spent so much time thinking over the situation that the company drew back its offer. Thus, he lost a lot of time, and he missed the chance to perform a job that he might have liked. Even if the occupation proved not to be advantageous, it would be little to no harm to him.
Secondly, when an individual spends too much time meandering a decision, their mind becomes biased and the final result would not probably be different from their first estimation. The human brain has the quality of favoring its own estimates and noticing aspects of a situation that confirm the mind's initial speculation. additionally, the mind ignores the facts that point to a contradiction of the already formed estimation of the brain. Thus, taking a lot of time to make a significant decision does not alter the final outcome in most cases. As an example, my br
In conclusion, I believe the ability to make timely decisions should be appreciated in people since these individuals waste less time, a valuable resource, they seize opportunities, and also, the extra time spent on making a decision is not likely to change the terminal outcome.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-07-18 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 81 | view |
2022-07-18 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 78 | view |
- TOP 27 integrated What caused the Little Ice Age 1 disrupted ocean currents 2 volcanoes eruption 3 indirect effect of humans activities 80
- TPO 53 independent agree or not it is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation 73
- TPO 37 integrated TED is not a good device and approach for turtles the rate of their trap is not so much there are other more beneficial ways it cannot work for larger animals 80
- TPO 08 agree or disagree television advertising directed towards young children age two to five should not be allowed 90
- educating children today is harder because of technology 86
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: much may; a good deal of may
While many may argue that a timely and fast decision i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 324, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Additionally
... confirm the minds initial speculation. additionally, the mind ignores the facts that point ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in many cases, in most cases, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1882.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88831168831 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81090568275 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555844155844 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.1104768982 48.9658058833 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.705882353 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6470588235 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1176470588 5.45110844103 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250099406894 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698511517297 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794145386364 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157348649308 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282079952479 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: much may; a good deal of may
While many may argue that a timely and fast decision i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 324, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Additionally
... confirm the minds initial speculation. additionally, the mind ignores the facts that point ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in many cases, in most cases, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1882.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88831168831 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81090568275 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555844155844 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.1104768982 48.9658058833 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.705882353 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6470588235 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1176470588 5.45110844103 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250099406894 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698511517297 0.076458572812 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794145386364 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157348649308 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282079952479 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.