The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart presents the significantly societies in the USA consumed in fast food restaurants from 2003 to 2013.
Overall, the highest of citizens ate the fast food in a decade was once a week and once or twice a month class of people and it were unstable in the periods.
The biggest of percentage of eating the fast food was two groups, it were people who ate the fast food once at a week and once or twice a month with below 30% and 30%, respectively in the first year and increased (approximately 32% and 25%, respectively) in 2006 but it decreased in the last year (below 30% and little more than 30, respectively).
In the second higest was two groups, it were several times a week and a few times a year. It were contribute about 15% to 20% and 10% to 15%, respectively during the periods. And the last level was every day and never people who consume the instant food. Both it were give less than 5% from the first to the last year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-19 | anarestu200321 | 56 | view |
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 56
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...eating the fast food was two groups, it were people who ate the fast food once at a ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ple who ate the fast food once at a week and once or twice a month with below 30...
^^
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ho ate the fast food once at a week and once or twice a month with below 30% and...
^^
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... approximately 32% and 25%, respectively in 2006 but it decreased in the last ye...
^^
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...espectively in 2006 but it decreased in the last year below 30% and little more ...
^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and little more than 30, respectively. In the second higest was two groups, it ...
^^^
Line 4, column 95, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...imes a week and a few times a year. It were contribute about 15% to 20% and 10% to ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 100, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'contributed'.
Suggestion: contributed
...a week and a few times a year. It were contribute about 15% to 20% and 10% to 15%, respec...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 265, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...e who consume the instant food. Both it were give less than 5% from the first to the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 766.0 1615.20841683 47% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 178.0 315.596192385 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.30337078652 5.12529762239 84% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45877511246 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 176.041082164 49% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488764044944 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 230.4 506.74238477 45% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.7180684578 49.4020404114 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.428571429 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158202544165 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762871180381 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851619076858 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123815189109 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0814207449761 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 50.2224549098 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.96 12.4159519038 64% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.58950901804 82% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 78.4519038076 31% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.