It is true that air travel is a giant consumer of the global non-renewable energies and it is linked in part to a contaminated environment. Hence, it is believed that people should limit their flights. However, from my perspective, this idea seems not to be feasible and some justifications will be given in this essay.
It is true that air travel has a devastating effect on the planet due to its exhaust fumes into the environment, however, other vehicles also cause pollution. Hence, I believe that it is impossible to ban air travel owing to its effectiveness regarding time-efficiency and safe-commuting. To be more specific, as people have to spend a large amount of time driving due to geographical distance, commuting by airplanes can be an effective alternative. Moreover, while there are only a few plane crashes around the world every year, the number of road accidents, in Vietnam for example, could be hundreds on a daily basis. As a result, air flight might be the most prefered option when it comes to long-distance transportations.
Another justification for my stance is that restricting air travel could take a heavy toll on the economy. In fact, the travel and tourism industry is the backbone of many developing and developed countries and provides employment for thousands of people. Therefore, if air travel is banned, international tourists have to rely on other means of transportation including water transports. However, this method might bring them a sense of uncomfort due to the time-inefficiency mentioned above, making them cancel their plans to go abroad. Consequently, a huge number of workers will be unemployed, causing the stagnation of these economies.
In conclusion, the limitation of air travel is impractical for the substantial benefits it produces. Hence, developing planes using more sustainable and environmentally friendly energy sources are more essential with a view to addressing the mentioned environmental problems.
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 78
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 56
- The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery 67
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33653846154 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35757794178 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605769230769 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2302276979 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229217051005 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736685364201 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367970921597 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132130294297 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460812035532 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33653846154 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35757794178 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605769230769 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2302276979 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229217051005 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736685364201 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367970921597 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132130294297 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460812035532 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.