The pie chart illustrates the percentage of five reasons which caused adolescents to use their telephones during a period from 2016 to 2019. Overall, the figures for people who used for social networks and digital camera showed upward trends, while there were gradual decreases in those for your email and phone calls. Additionally, social networks were most common reason for people to use their phones throughout the period.
The proportion of teenagers using phones for social webs was at an all-time high, beginning at 50% and ending with 56%; however, the year 2017 witnessed a slight decrease to its lowest point. Similarly, the figure for people using digital camera experienced a slight growth of 5% in 2019, after that fluctuated around 15% in the first two years of the given period.
In contrast, there was a moderate drop from 25% to 19% in the percentages of young people using phones for your email thought the figure always ranked second over the period. Moreover, the proportion of people calling by phones rose modestly to 13% in 2017 before a downward trend of 8% was recorded in that at the last year of period, then phone calls became the least reason which made teenagers using their phones.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: thatfrostbyte
Essay Categories
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, moreover, second, similarly, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92682926829 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40450697182 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59512195122 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.8035344487 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.285714286 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2857142857 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 5.23603664747 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191860992855 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103091752523 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0347479733826 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137317250503 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048788709233 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.