We live in a world of consumerism where our life is highly dependent on the products manufactured by various industries. Although most companies have a very human manner of producerism, others are not necessarily so since our world is not ideal. Therefore, I mostly agree with the first view presented in the statement for three reasons.
First, companies do care about their reputation. For example, many multinational companies including Nestle, TetraPak, and Danone work in the niche of food processing and thus inherently are liable to produce a significant amount of effluents as a result of production activities. However, these liquid wastes are treated meticulously for they pose a risk to the environment, particularly marine life. Therefore, these firms take pains to minimize the hazards caused by the discharge of these fluids into water bodies such as rivers and oceans. These activities although compulsory and mandated by the government, are done with the intention to promote their reputation and naturally show the efforts of the companies to take better care of the societies near which they operate. This is true and significantly strengthens the former view in the statement.
Second, companies are not able to maximize efficiency if their milieu is not in a sound condition. For instance, firms care for their employees' health through fitness training programs and promoting healthy diet habits. This not only benefits the workers directly but indirectly causes the companies to operate more productively since such employees fall sick less frequently and their mood is enhanced. The latter can be attributed to the positive impact on mental health by regular exercise, and the fact that the employees are aware that their employer does actually care for them.
On the other hand, in the vast corporate sector, there exist certain exceptions. All firms cannot function in the same manner. Their way of operating is highly influenced by the thought process of the individuals managing the firm and we do not live in an ideal world. Therefore, bad cases are likely to exist. For example, the company responsible for the Bhopal Gas Tragedy did not actually follow the mandatory rules and regulations required for safely producing chemicals. However, they used old and worn-out equipment in their factory which jeopardized the containment of a lethal chemical compound. This shows that a few firms are solely money minded and do not pay heed to the dire consequences to the environment as a result of their industrial activities.
In conclusion, although many would support the view that companies exist only to make money and do not innately care about their surroundings and people, the reality is quite the opposite. This is evidenced by several facts presented above. No doubt, outliers do exist in any non-ideal world. People who blatantly judge the benevolence of most firms without taking into account facts from reliable sources do so at their own peril.
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 100
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore a chain of video rental stores In order to reverse the recent decline in our profits we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore s ten video rental stores Since we are f 62
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well being of the societies and environments in which they operate Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations provided they operate within the law is to make as mu 70
- television is entirely democratic in that its content is controlled by what the people want 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2515.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 479.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25052192067 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82261954669 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572025052192 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 790.2 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.3391061246 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.791666667 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9583333333 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70833333333 5.21951772744 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103249084736 0.243740707755 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0254928573166 0.0831039109588 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302933564226 0.0758088955206 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0531253029706 0.150359130593 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284109700548 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 100.480337079 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.