Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Working at home using computers or telephones is better than working in the office.
As communication technology advances and the globe becomes less secure due to epidemics, many companies are opting to move their office online. Some believe that online work is inefficient and have several disadvantages, while others support the new way of working. As far as I am concerned, I prefer the homeworking style.
To begin with, working from home eliminates the need for employees to commute to the workplace. Commuting is becoming increasingly challenging as traffic congestion worsens. Many employees spend hours just making it to work. As a result, one of the benefits of working from home is the elimination of the commute. The time saved by not having to commute might be dedicated to either work or recreation. For example, my father drives two hours to work every day, but if he were able to work from home, he could spend one hour cooking a large supper for the family and the other hour doing extra work. As you can see, it benefits both employees and employers.
Second, the home environment is more calming than the workplace. Staying in a home with the furnishings and color scheme you choose will make people feel more comfortable. Many employees complain about working in a stressful setting and working in a pleasant atmosphere may assist to mitigate the consequences of psychological stress. For example, when I have my cat at my side, I can deal with my bad emotions and calm down more quickly, allowing me to work more efficiently. Furthermore, in a familiar location, we are more likely to concentrate on our task without being distracted by our surrounds. There are no additional technological obstacles with the use of computers and cellphones. Working from home may thus be an excellent way to boost productivity.
Finally, working from home is good for the environment. There is already a significant degree of environmental contamination, which has cautioned mankind to cease polluting the environment, and work hard to remedy the environmental problem. By utilizing less energy, no commuting can help to protect the environment from pollution. People will drive less after working at home, cutting harmful gas emissions. Meanwhile, driving less can help to minimize oil use. Conserving some oil is unquestionably worthwhile in the context of the energy crisis.
To sum up, working at home using computers or telephones offers employees a range of advantages and benefits when compared to the traditional work style.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-23 | cocoza@gmail.com | 90 | view |
| 2020-03-09 | allen365 | 70 | view |
| 2019-09-17 | Chih-Chieh | 66 | view |
| 2017-11-13 | mehrdad.imnnn | 76 | view |
| 2017-11-11 | shayanhgh | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays it is easier to maintain good health than it was in the past 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays it is easier to maintain good health than it was in the past 76
- Imagine that people in your community have been asked to decide how to spend public money over the next year One option for spending the money is to modernize and expand a public library The other option is to renovate a bus station and increase the numbe 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People are happier when they give away extra money to charity or a good cause rather than when they spend it on themselves 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students can learn as much by watching movies as they can learn by reading books 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 301, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...working from home is the elimination of the commute. The time saved by not having to commut...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, if, may, second, so, thus, while, for example, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2057.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12967581047 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03906444683 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573566084788 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 655.2 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8758084499 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7083333333 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7083333333 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336295081999 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897670839735 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709238876802 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188518967566 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821969474267 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.