The bar chart shows the number of cars per 1000 people in 5 European countries in 3 years compared with the European average.
The bar chart illustrates how many cars were owned by 1000 people in 5 unnamed European nations in 2005, 2009 and 2015, in comparison to the European average.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately evident that the number of car ownership in country 5 was higher than the average figure in Europe. In addition, country 4 was the only country where there was no change in the number of cars during the surveyed years.
Country 5 had the highest figure among the five regions, with 900 per 1000 in 2005, taller than the figure for Europe by roughly 200. The figure then dropped in 2009 before it rose up to almost one car per person in 2015. In contrast, Country 1 had the lowest number of automobiles, with only around 300 cars per 1000 people in 2006. It increased to 400 in 2009 and then returned to its original point six years later.
Country 3 and 4 shared similar figures of approximately 700 per 1000 people in 2005, similar to the European average. However, while the number remained unchanged in country 4, the figures for country 3 decreased to nearly 600 in 2015. Finally, the number of motor cars per 1000 in country 2 went from 500 in 2005 to about 560 in 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-05 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 73 | view |
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions Do you agree or disagree 70
- In today s world of advanced science and technology we still greatly value our artists such as musicians painters and writers What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot 73
- In many countries people like to eat a wider range of food that cannot be grown in their local place Therefore much of the food people eat today has to come from other regions Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh disadvantages 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002 2006 and 2010 57
- Organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... nearly 600 in 2015. Finally, the number of motor cars per 1000 in country 2 went...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, look, so, then, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52093023256 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35394792829 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53023255814 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.7540800771 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.2 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.428686645109 0.215688989381 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164822432319 0.103423049105 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862225813834 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252671319669 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541164535473 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.