Both the reading and the listening talk about theories explaining high pitch voice of a 52-hertz whales. The former asserts that there are some hypothesis which shows why these whales have special sound. The professor, on the other hand, casts doubt on it one by one by saying that scientists have trouble trying to explain this unusual song of whales and also its uniqueness remains mystery which goes as follows.
First of all, both the article and the lecture posit whether hybridation is a possible explanation. The passage suggests that maybe its 52 hertz voice is due to hybrid offspring coming from interbreeding of two different species. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects the idea by pointing out that their migration pattern is unusual. He adds that these hybrid animals must follow their parents' migration habits, but they don't. Also, location of 52 hertz whales shows a strange migratory pattern which they may migrate alone. Therefore, the first reason does not seem to be correct.
Second of all, both the author and the professor put forward whether these animals had hearing or not. The author claims that those whales had damaged hearings because of different sound they create. The speaker, however, rebuts this by explaining that high pitch vocal comes from their physical structure locating in whale's throat. As a result, their throat must be strange which makes them able to produce high frequency voices. But, there is not strong evidence to illustrate a correlation between damaged sense of hearing and throat structure. So the second proposal is invalid too.
Third, both the text and the speaker put forth the likelihood of being rare species. The article avers that maybe this special animals are members of a nadir species died out. The lecture, conversely, refutes it by holding that they are not rare species due to the evidence brought about by subsea technologies that their parents could hear voices but not one of them heard something before this experiment. So the third proposition is incorrect.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A person should never make an important decision alone Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils the petrified remains of ancient organisms ever since the eighteenth century In recent years however the sale of fossils particularly of dinosaurs and other large vertebrates has grown into a big bus 81
- In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recycling materials Companies that receive
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The extended family grandparents cousins aunts and uncles is less important now than it was in the past 70
- TPO 39 Independent taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hypotheses', 'hypothesises'?
Suggestion: hypotheses; hypothesises
... The former asserts that there are some hypothesis which shows why these whales have speci...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 257, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'one by'.
Suggestion: one by
...r, on the other hand, casts doubt on it one by one by saying that scientists have trouble try...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 418, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...heir parents migration habits, but they dont. Also, location of 52 hertz whales show...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, in contrast, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 334.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09580838323 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4410875712 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571856287425 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.3735883374 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5789473684 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5789473684 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.10526315789 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.27373068433 257% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133517195742 0.272083759551 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0347634472379 0.0996497079465 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490160022248 0.0662205650399 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0794537144567 0.162205337803 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05590874047 0.0443174109184 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 63.6247240618 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.