Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
I disagree to a certain extent with the statement that colleges have the responsibility to discourage students from pursuing fields of study in the areas in which there are likely not to succeed in. A carrier choice is a student and family's responsibility. A college can only advice and not choose a carrier path for the students.
Choices of carrier differ from individual to individual. Some choose carrier paths looking at the monitory benefits and not considering other factors. Some choose certain paths because they have a passion in that area. So i believe is up to the student and maybe family members to choose what the want to study. If a student meets the standard qualifications that are required for them to be admitted in that college thus enough evidence that there are likely to succeed.
For colleges to say that the students is unlikely to succeed in the field of choice will be unfair to the student. Some students might not be brilliant but are driven by passion and that can make a student succeed in that area. For a example a certain who had a passion for sawing but had not done any courses on fashion and designing. Today she is known in for the best designs in town. So this lady was passion driven and it turned out to excel in.
However, colleges discouraging students might be advantage in that students would be wasting time and resources doing something that they are likely to fail. For example pursuing a four year degree and fail at the end of the pragramme. You would have wasted your four years and also the money that you have been using to pay for your tuition and support.
In conclusion, a college can only offer advice to a student were necessary and give a student the a choice on which carrier to pursue.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
2020-01-27 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
2020-01-23 | lanhhoang | 16 | view |
2020-01-22 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
2020-01-20 | maneesha ch | 50 | view |
- The purpose of higher education is to prepare students for the future, but classen students are at a serious disadvantage in the competition for post-college employment due to the university's burdensome breadth requirements. classen's job placement rate 40
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 40
- A nation should require all its students to study the same curriculum before entering college 50
- Question authority. Only by questioning accepted wisdom can we advance our understanding of the world. 40
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with 20
a college can only offer advice to a student were necessary
Description: can you re-write this sentence?
Sentence: In conclusion, a college can only offer advice to a student were necessary and give a student the a choice on which carrier to pursue.
Description: The token the is not usually followed by an article
Suggestion: Refer to the and a
wrong: carrier correct: career
flaws:
No. of Different Words: 147 200
and the essay is not talking about career success. You changed the topic to:
Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed in career.
-----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: ? out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 312 350
No. of Characters: 1414 1500
No. of Different Words: 147 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.203 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.532 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.478 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 103 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 78 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 37 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 17 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.353 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.911 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.529 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.311 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.545 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.098 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5