Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Female and male university students should
live in separate residence halls.
We are born into complex and demanding society, and we have to try to find our place in it. Although, opponents might claim otherwise, dividing students according gender is not reasonable, so I disagree with the statement. My views are based on social and educational grounds, and in the subsequent paragraphs, I will aupport my major reasons with examples.
First of all, modern society is more open an understanding than one humankind created in the past. Separating studenst into dormitories appointed for woman or man is not reflecting values of liberal society and, therefore, it is not acceptable. Even though similar practices are still present in more conservative countries, there is no scientifical or statistical reason to keep it that way. It promotes that gender equality is not important, and that treating people this way is acceptable. Some may believe that it is more safe for woman to live away from the opposit gender, but I think it just shows lack of trust in young males and their ability to control themselves. My personal experience demonstrates that it is beneficial to live with boys. During my studies, I lived in a dormitory without gender segregation. In the case I needed to lift something heavy or struggled to open a jar of pickels all I needed to do is to just go next door and asked for help. It is possible that if this had not happened to me, I would have not seen the advatages of mix accomodation.
From an educational standpoint, separate residence halls usually have a strickt policy about visiting rooms of one another, especially when students do not share the same gender, and that can create problems when you need to finish last minute assigment or you want to study together for upcoming exam. Additionaly, it is crucial for the young generation to learn how to live with each other no matter who they are. For instance, I studied astrophysics and I was only girl in the program. Many times, we worked together until late evening and that improved not just our grades but also made our bond more solid. If my dormitory had had rules about genders, it would have pushed me away from my classmates, and I would not have had such a strong relationship with them.
In this essay, I discussed my belief that separating students because of assign gender is not the best choice. I feel this way not just because modern society should not segragate but also because it is not practical for students.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Work has a bigger impact on your overall happiness than your social life 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Ecologically sustainable forestry 3
- Your university is located in a community with a struggling economy The school administration has decided to make it mandatory for each student to volunteer at least 40 hours per year to one of the town s many volunteer programs Do you agree or disagree w 76
- Do you agree or disagree People who spend more than an hour a day on social media are less happy than those who spend less time on social media 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...woman or man is not reflecting values of liberal society and, therefore, it is no...
^^
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
...people this way is acceptable. Some may believe that it is more safe for woman to live ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 629, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: had
...de our bond more solid. If my dormitory had had rules about genders, it would have push...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, still, therefore, for instance, i feel, i think, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2027.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80331753555 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75573670983 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563981042654 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4710223764 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.684210526 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2105263158 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84210526316 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164720052416 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425149580641 0.076458572812 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484517395214 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930507792021 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218822843711 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.