Many argue that an increase in fuel prices will solve the problem of the environment. While this idea could help reduce the number of harmful fumes, I maintain that this is not a sustainable and long-term solution. Instead, I believed that a global awareness campaign and making use of alternative clean energy are the more feasible option.
On the one hand, the world’s environmental problems can partly be solved by raising fuel costs. The increase in fuel prices means that the traffic of vehicles will decrease, especially for private vehicles. So, environmental pollutants factors such as exhaust emission or noise, etc. also improved. However, I think this is a short-term option even not feasible because limiting human needs is almost impossible. People can only limit travel for a short time but not forever because it is also related to many other demands such as work or hanging out. They will find ways to satisfy their personal needs such as finding fuel smuggling places or buying poor-quality fuel, which inadvertently will make the pollution problems worse. Moreover, traffic stagnation will greatly affect the production and transportation process in particular and the economy in general. Therefore, increasing fuel prices is not one of the good solutions to improving environmental problems.
On the other hand, causes of pollution are diverse, involving the use of plastic bags in shopping or chemicals in both agriculture and industry which contaminate both water and land. Therefore, the most effective solution would be running a worldwide campaign that raises consumer awareness about the environmental cost of their shopping habits and presses companies to reduce the consumption of noxious chemicals. Another solution suggested is to promote clean energy sources. Renewable sources such as wind, solar and nuclear are also good at solving the world’s environmental problems as they don’t produce many greenhouse gases. After all, aiming for long-term and sustainable solutions like the ones above is one of best way to solve environmental problems.
In light of the above arguments, I think that both the drawbacks outweigh the benefits. In light of the above arguments, I think that the drawbacks outweigh the benefits. It is undeniable that environmental catastrophe partly becomes from fossil fuel vehicles, but the truth is, no one can afford to be without personal vehicles. To relish this challenge, I really believe that renewable energy and raising people’s awareness about protecting the environment should be considered as a feasible alternative.
- The diagram below shows the development of a particular area between 1965 and the present day
- the chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000. 67
- Students leave high school without learning the way how to manage their money What are the reasons and solutions of this issue 59
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places And how to increase its popularity 56
- The diagram below shows the development of a particular area between 1965 and the present day
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 718, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the best'.
Suggestion: of the best
...le solutions like the ones above is one of best way to solve environmental problems. I...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, really, so, therefore, while, after all, i think, in general, in particular, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2192.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 404.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42574257426 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92455706326 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537128712871 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6154284339 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.6 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.65 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240483201792 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067753639607 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080003127789 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134165295207 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660245902772 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 718, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the best'.
Suggestion: of the best
...le solutions like the ones above is one of best way to solve environmental problems. I...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, really, so, therefore, while, after all, i think, in general, in particular, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2192.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 404.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42574257426 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92455706326 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537128712871 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6154284339 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.6 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.65 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240483201792 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067753639607 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080003127789 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134165295207 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660245902772 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.