I agree with the people who believe that traveling to and living in numerous places increases one s ability to relate and connect to other people more than people who believe that this ability can be cultivated by living in one place. I justify the prompt with the help of three examples.
To begin with, traveling to diversified countries such as India will help you gain more experience. For example, traveling to hilly areas may help you to learn how people survive those harsh climatic conditions. In the same way, traveling to hotter regions may help you grasp the knowledge of the importance of water.
Additionally, people in different regions may follow different cultures. For example, people in Tamil Nadu state in India, mostly follow Hinduism whereas people in Kerala state mostly follow Christianity. So, traveling to different regions will give you different exposure than staying in the same region.
Also, people in various regions speak different languages. The northern part of India mostly speaks Hindi whereas the people in Southern India speak Tamil, Hindi, Malayalam, Telugu, etc.. Traveling to various locations can make you multi-lingual too.
Thus, from my point of view traveling to various locations and living and following different cultures will help you socialize more with people rather than staying in the same location and developing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...eak Tamil, Hindi, Malayalam, Telugu, etc.. Traveling to various locations can make...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, thus, whereas, for example, such as, to begin with, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 19.5258426966 5% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1162.0 2235.4752809 52% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 219.0 442.535393258 49% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30593607306 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 4.55969084622 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59356711011 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 215.323595506 53% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520547945205 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 704.065955056 50% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.3059174326 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8333333333 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283878030338 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946810045956 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.177658078943 0.0758088955206 234% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173830369101 0.150359130593 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.213441997027 0.0667264976115 320% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 100.480337079 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.