The linegraph represents the fraction of working age population in France, United States, Japan and Germany between 1960 to 2050.
Overall, the proportion of working age adults in the four countries surged relatively atfirst and then has been predicted to plunged significantly over the years shown.
The rate of working age population in Germany was higher than those three countries apart from the year 2050. In 1960 the percentage of working age in germany was 67 percent. This figure was the highest incomparison with the other three. From 1960 to 1975, there was a sharp decline in the adults of working age in Germany meanwhile a percentage of Japanese working age was the second highest. From 1960 to 1985, there was a dramtical soar from 65 to 70 percent. In 1985 Germany went up from 64 to 69 percent people in working age but later this percentage is predicted to tank steeply in 2050 from 69 to 55 percent. Meanwhile, Japanese working age population is expected to go down dramatically from 50 to 70 percent.
Starting at lower age percentage in 1960 France and United States rose slightly to 2000. According to current working age prediction, France will plunge relatively from 67 to 57 percent, United States will expect to sink minimally from 65 to 60 percent.
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 67
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 78
- The table The table shows the production of milk annually in four countries in 1990 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 78
- Some people say that we do not need printed paper newspapers Do you agree or disagree 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, then, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89861751152 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6655789651 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497695852535 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3452613001 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6363636364 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417713725047 0.215688989381 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178598712763 0.103423049105 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731053017803 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245682540699 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407820266067 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.