Comuting has been one of the greatest concerns of human being as maintanance of their livelihood depends on comuting and carrying cargoes. Although, means of transport are facilitating our lives, they are harmful for human wellbeing by damaging environment. So many people prefer to use energy-saving vehicles while the rest still prefere to use common means of transport. In this essay I will explaine why I agree with former group.
Firstly, using hybrid and electronic cars or bicycles saves non-renewable sources and decreases noise polution. Transport is the largest energy consuming sector and by using environmental- friendly transport forms, saved energy can be used in future or for other purposes. Energy-efficient transport offers huge potential for reducing the demand for oil and energy in general. For example, Sweden could decreas the demand for fossil fuels in transport sector about 10% by mass production of electronic cars. Moreover,transportation is the most problematic source of noise in cities. According to Oxford university press, road traffic is the main source of noise pollution as well as rail and aircraft. Electronic vehicles are the solution to solve this problem as they are almost silent.
Secondly, this new kinds of transport system leads to improved air qualiy and reducing Co2 emission. Ecco friendly forms of transport do not produce harmful emissions that cause air pollution. Air pollution is the main cause of cancer, lung desease and heart attacks according to health organisation experts. In addition, we can reduce our carbon foot print by choosing non-polluting agents. Evidently, Co2 gas is the most important contributing factor to global warming which is the most urgent issue facing the world nowadays. The emission of this harmful gas is almost half the diesel cars in ecologically sound automobils.
To conclude, we should change our ways to save the sources of oil and other fuels from running out and preserve our planet from dire concequances of pollution and warming by hiring more efficient cars.
- The world would be a better place if we all spoke the same language Do you agree 11
- Nowadays genetically modified food is widespread all over the world While proponents of GM crops ensure that these foods are safe for human consumption and help to increase food supplies others argue that their effects on health have not been studied long 89
- More and more couples are deciding to be child free to have no children in other words Some people claim that those couples reach this conclusion through entirely selfish reasons While others think that they came to this decision through noble motives suc 89
- Atomic energy is becoming more and more popular energy source However some people argue that nuclear power puts life on the Earth to danger What is your opinion 89
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , transportation
... production of electronic cars. Moreover,transportation is the most problematic source of noise...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 575, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the most problematic source of noise in cities. According to Oxford university p...
^^^
Line 7, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... fuels from running out and preserve our planet from dire concequances of polluti...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, for example, in addition, in general, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37345679012 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98642173074 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604938271605 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1141867039 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7222222222 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72222222222 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160002974261 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445144903529 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0260270394294 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842179510558 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251618212758 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.