It is often debated that information on scientific findings, business strategies and other academic areas should be widely accessible. Whereas others believe some specific data should not be revealed freely because of their importance and variability. However, I do agree with the latter.
On the one hand, the ever-growing advancement in technology has been accoured as a result of the academic papaers that shared freely through the Internet . As a result, agile-mind individuals by making good use of these papers have being end-up with new inventions. Furthermore, businesspersons by monitoring sales figures based on different strategies which is shared freely could boost their profit. As countries’ economy tide up to these business, by flourishing these section whole countries’ economy will growth which is beneficial to all people.
On the other hand, it mostly takes too long for a person to reach significant findings and if this data were published freely without gaining any reward it could be discouraging to them to sacrifice their time and energy for more discoveries. Similarly, a manager who put enormous effort into reaching innovative ways to surpass their rivals would be disappointed if their idea is revealed to their counterparts easily. Furthermore, some information like building atamoc bombs or nuclear weapons could have a devastating impact on the world if it reaches a wrong person.
In conclusion, society could indeed benefit from the free use of information shared worldwide but it is discouraging for a brilliant mind to sacrifice their life for nothing profitable. However one always should consider the irreparable impact of revealing some sensitive findings especially the ones related to war weapons.
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment
- Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects Other people think that in today s world subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 89
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admissions to museums outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... that shared freely through the Internet . As a result, agile-mind individuals by ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wth which is beneficial to all people. On the other hand, it mostly takes too l...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, similarly, so, whereas, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51301115242 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04093922752 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646840148699 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9369405574 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.583333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243452544877 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804900865857 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601193493827 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139722445243 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650522275034 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.