The charts show the proportion of male and female employees in different job categories in an engineering company in 2005 and in 2015.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given charts illustrate the percentage of employees in both sexes in five different job categories in an engineering corporation in the years 2005 and 2007.
Overall, women attended to administration position more than men and more than other jobs in both years, but in 2015 analytics were most men, which were the highest given position men in that year. However, in 2005, vice president and analyst had the most men in positions.
First of all, in 2005, the percentage of men joined to be an administrate was the lowest between other jobs, almost 10%. On the other hand, vice presidents and analysts were more v men rather than women, and with the highest percent of attendants for these jobs, nearly 70%, which in regards to women, these statics were vice versa in percentage.
Secondly, in the year 2005, in contrast to the year 2005, the number of individuals for vice president and although managing positions were the same for both genders and have been almost 50%. Directors, however, in second place, had 60% of chairs for women, besides the analysts was the last position that women had in mentioned year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | dung16022002 | 64 | view |
| 2023-02-09 | mahsamoazzzzzzzzez | 73 | view |
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 73
- The maps show the changes in the plan of house in 2010 compared to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process of instant noodles 84
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 59, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...005, the percentage of men joined to be an administrate was the lowest between other jobs, almo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 282, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...dants for these jobs, nearly 70%, which in regards to women, these statics were vice versa in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, in contrast, first of all, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91052631579 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5476130809 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.3467452494 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.285714286 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.0 5.23603664747 306% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0938540134064 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592301127974 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802978320214 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0870547320208 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0945047036104 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 59, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...005, the percentage of men joined to be an administrate was the lowest between other jobs, almo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 282, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...dants for these jobs, nearly 70%, which in regards to women, these statics were vice versa in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, in contrast, first of all, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91052631579 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5476130809 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.3467452494 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.285714286 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 16.0 5.23603664747 306% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0938540134064 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592301127974 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802978320214 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0870547320208 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0945047036104 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.