No matter an individual's friends have the same opinions with him/her or not, both of them are essential to this person. Fellows sometimes against you could share you with different thoughts, while the friends with same ideas could work or play with you efficiently.
On one hand, people need friends holding opposite thoughts at times. Usually, people would not easily accept the different views from their friends, even recognize them as betrayals by mistake. However, everyone is limited by their own vision. Those who against you some times more precious than following you. Some risks could be evade by the help of these guys. In our daily life, especially making decisions, it is difficult to analyze issues from other aspects. At this moment, the siganificance of these friends against you arises, their disagreements could be the right choice for you. Furthermore, they are still one's friends who want to help these people in another way.
On the other hand, those who agree with a person are also valuable for making friends. You can get along with each other fluently in that the visions of you are similar. Messi , Suarez and Neymar for instance. They were all the strikers of Barcelona football team, they played together quite well on the pitches, even famed as "MSN" band by football fans. In the football match, the teamwork of three strikers is a hard issue due to their same position and mission. While they all originated south American players' excellent skills and football philosophy. They are all friends and could make shooting oppurtunities for the other two by pass balls or attracting the defenders' attentions. Thus, hundreds of goals they scored togher, which helped Bacelona to win many trophes in the last ten years.
In all, both of the two types of friends are crucial to people in that we not only need the help from those who shared the same views, but also benefit from those who disagree with us occasionally.
- Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experien 56
- Your neighbours have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your houselflat Write a letter to your neighbours In your letterexplain the reasons for the noiseapologisedescribe what action you will takeWrite at least 150 words 61
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledg 56
- Using a computer everyday can have more negative than positive effects on young children Do you agree or disagree Give reasons and relevant examples 70
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...at the visions of you are similar. Messi , Suarez and Neymar for instance. They we...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, still, thus, well, while, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97865853659 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48903323484 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585365853659 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8237725957 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9473684211 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2631578947 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15789473684 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272385880631 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748848678018 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738389653181 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174746298793 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634450519617 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.