The given line graph represents the number of hamburgers, Pizza and Fried Chicken that teenagers in Mauritius consumed between 1985 and 2015.
What stands out from the graph is that while hamburgers and fried chicken witnessed an upward trend, the opposite trend was for Pizza. Obviously, the amount of pizza eaten by Mauritian teenagers declined sharply over the period shown.
In 1985, Pizza was the most favorite junk food of teenagers in Mauritius with 60 times, followed by hambugers (10 times) and fried chichen (5 times) which was below one tenth comparing with pizza. However, over the years surveyed his kind of food lost it popularity and became the least favorite of the three in 2015.
From the least wanted food among teenagers in Mauritius, fried chicken climbed up signifficantly in the first 20 years before experiencing a stability and then ended by a slight surge about 63 times in 2015. Mauritian teenagers were in favor of hamburgers, which made it a leap of 7 times higher than that of the first year taking up over 70 times per year in the last year.
- the table below gives information on the frequency of using internet by adults in one European country between 2006 to 2010 64
- The diagram below shows the process of making soft cheese Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 78
- The table below shows percentage of students giving good ratings for different aspects of a university in China in 2000 2005 2010 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, then, while, as for, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83695652174 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49145515137 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58152173913 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0464552872 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.142857143 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149418465399 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758835935881 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458758860031 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0958497729377 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038215559582 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.