The reading and the lecture are both about possibility of apperanse of bees before 200 million years ago. More specifically, in regard to the passage, the writer presents three theories about evidence for a structure found in a tree in Arizona made not by bees in ancinet times. The lecturer disputes the claims made in the article. His position is that it is possible that these nests where construct by bees.
First and foremost, the author of the reading states there were no ancient remains for bees before 200 million years ago. The article mentions that the first preserved fossil for a bee is before 100 million years ago only. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that this argument is not persuasive because the reason of not found any remains is the type of trees which preserve the bees inside it. Additinally, he points out that the tree which can save the bee for long time must has a liquid called reisa and may not be found in the past.
Secondly, the author suggests lack of flowering plants in that period is a good explanation because bees feed on this type of food. In the article it is said that bees and flowers have biological relationship from first appear of flowers before 125 million years ago. Again, the speaker specifically addresses this point when he states bees are found before flowers and they consume and feed on non-flowering plants like firns. He goes on to say that after evolve flowering palnts bees adaptes these plants.
Finally, the author brings his argument to a close by suggesting that the structure which found in Arizona is different from the new type of bees because it lacks some details like it it does not have spiral cap, so it may made by other types of insects. Not surprisingly, the professor takes issue with this claim by contending that there is a chemical evidence confirm that bees protect their nest from water by chemical material. He notes that chemical analysis asserted that the same type of materials found in the last and the new rooms of bees.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The extended family grandparents cousins aunts and uncles is less important now than it was in the past 80
- Some people like to keep a record of their own experiences by uploading pictures and other information to social networking sites Other people prefer not to create such records Which approach do you prefer and why Use specific reasons and examples to supp 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Having children is less important than it was in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words Do not use memorized examples 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject 81
- Hail pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States Hail pellets can fall with great force and destroy crops in the field Over the last few decades a method of 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: it
...bees because it lacks some details like it it does not have spiral cap, so it may mad...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 30.3222958057 168% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 356.0 270.72406181 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73595505618 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41090450825 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488764044944 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 519.3 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5204166649 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.375 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6875 7.06452816374 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29098077443 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966319201978 0.0996497079465 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746579258827 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176743849475 0.162205337803 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547948450738 0.0443174109184 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.