The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a company that builds shopping malls around the country.
"The surface of a section of Route 101, paved just two years ago by Good Intentions Roadways, is now badly cracked with a number of dangerous potholes. In another part of the state, a section of Route 40, paved by Appian Roadways more than four years ago, is still in good condition. In a demonstration of their continuing commitment to quality, Appian Roadways recently purchased state-of-the-art paving machinery and hired a new quality-control manager. Therefore, I recommend hiring Appian Roadways to construct the access roads for all our new shopping malls. I predict that our Appian access roads will not have to be repaired for at least four years."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
The vice president recommends hiring Appian Roadways to build new roads. These roads should not require to be repaired for at least four years. This conclusion is based on evidence which ought to be carefully questioned in order to give a comprehensive estimation of the soundness of the argument and prediction.
The main evidence of this argument is that a section of Rout 101 which was constructed by Good Intentions Roadways (GIR) two years ago has worse condition than a section of Route 40 which was built by Appian Roadways (AR) more than four years ago. However, is this comparison reasonable? Probably climate, weather, geographic locations of these roads are not equal. Consequently, these factors may dramatically affect the endurance of road surfaces. Moreover, one road may be heavily used by trucks and other heavy vehicles when the second road may be used rarely and by automobiles thus a road which is used more often will wear off faster than a part of road which is used rarely therefore, this evidence cannot be used to prove better quality of AR’s roads.
The second evidence which is shared with us is that AR has purchased new paving equipment with a new quality-control manager. This fact should serve as a proof of company's adherence to quality. At the same, time we do not know anything about the manager, perhaps, he or she has no or little, furthermore, the rival company may have similar equipment as well as a highly qualified control manager. Consequently, this evidence does not support author’s belief in superiority of AR over GIR.
Finally, the arguer claims that if company hires AR to construct new roads these roads will not require a repair for at least four ears. However, the examples which are used to support his claim are outdated. For instance, these companies may change their management, CEOs and policies, perhaps, employees who worked two and four years ago were substituted by new ones. In fact, we have no information about the current state of these two firms. Moreover, even if we assume that nothing changes, the extrapolation of two cases is not reasonable. The likeliness exists that other roads which were constructed by GIR serve in average more than four years and the roads of AR require to be repaired more often than the writer expects. In other words, the information which was used by the originator is insufficient to draw a thoughtful and coherent prediction.
In conclusion, the writer of the argument asserts that to be sure that new roads will not have to be repaired for at least 4 years and thus their construction should be given to AR; unfortunately, the writer does not manage create a solid foundation for his or her claim and thus the predicted result may not be acquired.
- People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. I 80
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the 70
- People's attitudes are determined more by their immediate situation or surroundings than by society as a whole.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position y 30
- Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to choose fields of study in which jobs are plentiful.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and 77
- True success can be measured primarily in terms of the goals one sets for oneself Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 80
perhaps, he or she has no or little,
perhaps, he or she has no or little ???
----------------
argument 1 -- OK
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- OK
----------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 468 350
No. of Characters: 2228 1500
No. of Different Words: 216 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.651 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.761 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.653 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 142 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 109 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 78 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 51 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.4 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 15.193 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.7 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.291 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.49 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.099 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5