The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015

Given table comparing the problems faced by students of two grade schools in 2005 and 2015. In general, it is clearly apparent that learners at School A faced far more issues that those at School B.

The problems depicted in the table cover seven skill areas. In the first period, the majority of students at School A struggled with their ability to put concentration in lessons and to follow instructions at 40% and 42% respectively. The same problem in concentration also faced by most children at School B although the figures much more below the School A's at 15%. Beside that, the second highest ability issue reported at School B was the ability of students expressing their idea verbally at 14%.

In 2015, overall the percentage of problems faced by the learners at School A declined while those at School B increased. The two most common problems faced by School A students switched to handwriting and spelling problems at 28% and 25% respectively while concentration and following instructions issues decreased to 18%. However, children at School B still struggled with the same matters with the last 10 years at almost the same percentage at 15%.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...od, the majority of students at School A struggled with their ability to put conc...
^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: A student; Students
...wo most common problems faced by School A students switched to handwriting and spelling pr...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s at almost the same percentage at 15%.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, second, so, still, while, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 967.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95897435897 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78704620727 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502564102564 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7743636027 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.444444444 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259564374132 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151574742072 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115320044941 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225774688259 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733016759244 0.0819641961636 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.