The line graph illustrates the proportion of concert attendants in terms of five different age groups in a particular city from 2010 to 2015.
Overall, it can be seen that all six age brackets experienced an upward trend in the number of concert attendants, except for those aged 25-44 and 55-64. Notably, the majority of the youngest age group joined in live concert, while the elderly were least interested in this activity.
Looking at the chart in greater detail, the 16-24 and 45-54 age groups accounted for about of 40% of total number of its attendants in 2010. Over the next 5 years, the proportion of the 16-24-year-olds peaked of nearly 70%, while those aged 45-54 rose slightly to just under 50%, despite a small dip to 40% in 2012. Similarly, the proportion of the elderly experienced a significant fluctuation, rising from only 10% in 2010 to 20% in 2015.
In terms of the remaining age brackets, there were about 52% of concert viewers aged 25-44%, which was double those of aged 55-64 (26%) in 2010. One year later, the 25-44 age group dropped suddenly to 40% before experiencing a constant recovery to 52% in 2015. After increasing slightly one year later, the percentage of 55-to-64-year-olds decreased slighly, hitting at 22%.
- Internet access helps young people and workers achieve their education and work goals more easily than before To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 78
- The chart below shows the spending in million dollars per household in the US on five different products in 2010 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below describes how stormwater is recycled in an Australian city 11
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...olds decreased slighly, hitting at 22%.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, similarly, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91469194313 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8240640009 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578199052133 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.1584249059 43.030603864 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.222222222 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27782315846 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124774287193 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964811697955 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19763568125 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107203853071 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.