It is argued that increasing the minimum maturity requirement for motorist is the most effective measure to enhance the safety on the lane. While this approach can potentially reduce roadway disaster, I maintain that imposing stricter penalties for transportation violations and improving public transportation would be more feasible solutions to address the root causes of travel accidents.
Undoubtedly, raising the minimum old age for car operator can decrease the number of lane hazard. In reality, youthful motorist who may lack experience and maturity are more likely to engage in hazardous and reckless propulsive behaviors, putting themselves and other commuters in danger. Requiring individuals to wait until they are older to obtain a formal operator license can encourage them to operate car more responsibly and cautiously, which contributes to a safer propulsive environment. For example, countries like Japan and South Korea, where the minimum legal youth for jockey is higher, have had lower rates of wagon collisions involving inexperienced drivers.
However, increasing the legal maturity limit for motorist does not fully address the underlying causes of boulevard mishap. Moreover, it is critical to note that shipment setback can stem from various factors, including careless propulsive behaviors or poor transport infrastructure, not solely from budding drivers. Thus, stricter punishments for transportation offenses, such as heavy fines or longer license suspensions for repeat offenders, would serve as a more effective deterrent against careless propulsive behaviors. Additionally, the government should invest money in upgrading public transportation, including providing more bus and train services, which can encourage citizens to rely less on private car, ultimately leading to fewer lane mishap. The Mass Rapid Transit System in Singapore, for instance, has significantly reduced the number of private cars on the roadway by implementing strict laws and penalties for travel violations, along with developing a well-established subway and bus system.
In conclusion, although raising the maturity of legal eligibility for car operator can improve thoroughfare safety by reducing disaster involving youthful people, it is vital to address the root causes of travel hazard through stricter punishments for transportation offenses and upgrades to public transport. I am also convinced that once these measures are implemented, travel commuters will obey these regulations, creating safety conditions for all boulevard users.
- The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003 2006 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each categories from five organizations 73
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2191.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.92162162162 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10816568689 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608108108108 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 689.4 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.0816184591 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.538461538 106.682146367 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4615384615 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146268664707 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612662393187 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508422251516 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0964132124544 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00365306940418 0.056905535591 6% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.7 13.0946893788 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 17.68 50.2224549098 35% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.8 11.3001002004 158% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.35 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 78.4519038076 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.