The given bar chart depicts how many male and female learners are adept at a second language in China, Romania, Thailand, India, Russia, and Vietnam.
Overall, India and Romania have comparatively higher proportions of students proficient in a foreign language. Moreover, women in the given nations, apart from Thailand, surpass men.
India has the highest proficiency rate, with nearly 70% of female students and over half of the male students versed in a second language. Following that, in Romania, over 63% and 42% of women and men are multilingual respectively, creating the largest disparity between the two genders in the chart. The only exception is in the case of Thailand, where the males are more fluent in a foreign language than females (over 30% compared to 27%).
Following India and Romania, Vietnam has the third-highest overall percentage of foreign-language speakers, with 56% and nearly 42% of its female and male population. Furthermore, over a third of Russian males are good at a foreign language, while approximately one-fifth of Chinese men have such skills. Meanwhile, the proportions of their female counterparts are recorded at 42 and almost 30% respectively.
- Many different countries have most shops and products as the same Some consider it a positive dvelopment whereas others consider it negative Discuss both sides and give your opinion 14
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in the sea what are the reason and solution 89
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 67
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting universities studies Discuss the advantage and disadvantage for young people who decide to do this 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, second, third, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32446808511 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02376190108 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7135705861 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.222222222 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110362824972 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502389767313 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035756205771 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0742190973727 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.01570230322 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.