Some people think that people should be given right use of fresh water as they like. Others believe governments should control toughly over the use of fresh water. Discuss both view and give your own opinion.
In the era of rising population, water becomes such a scarcity within numerous regions that many individuals would advocate that the national authorities should restrict water use while others support that every citizens should be given the right to consume water whenever they want. This essay will discuss both views and argue in favour of the former.
On the one hand, allowing people to use water freely when needed may bring about several benefits. Water plays a crucial role in our daily activities such as personal hygiene or cooking. With restricted access to water, most households would feel that it reduces productivity in their lives as they have to use less water to, for example, cook their food and clean their houses which are their basic needs. In addition, people needs to keep themselves hydrated during day hours to function effectively. Being able to drink fresh water freely can help humans perform better physically and mentally. For instance, most people need to drink at least 2 litres of water per day to protect their health and boost their energy.
On the other hand, using water excessively can cause detrimental impact to our society as a whole. The first worth-mentioning fact perhaps is that water is not an unlimited resource and there are many areas in the world are now lack of water such as Africa. Thus, the governments need to take action in preserving water resources and make sure that citizens are using it correctly. Water shortage may lead to severe health problems and eventually, increase death rates. Furthermore, if water use is controlled thoroughly, people will gradually have a notion of consuming natural resources in a reasonable amount so as not to waste it. This will take the government less effort and money to exploit other natural resources.
In conclusion, it seems to me that imposing limitations in water use is more favourable than allowing people use it unrestrictedly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-05 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | hyst12 | 89 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants 78
- The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple producing countries in 2009 and 2019 and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 89
- Handwriting today is less formal than it was in the past What are the causes of this change Is it a positive or negative development 89
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table shows the production of milk annually in four countries in 1990 2000 and 2010 The information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, while, at least, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.075 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65382242011 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609375 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0590958028 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.266666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.13333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361528968071 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112212626187 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591499054622 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221782567352 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412290257749 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.