Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In the digital age, it is widely held that videos are more useful in comprehending the diverse lifestyles of people around the world, compared to written papers. While I agree that video documentaries can hold some advantages, I do not agree that it is superior than written ones.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that video records are visually informative and takes minimum effort to produce. The first worth-mentioning fact is that sometimes written papers are not able to convey all the backgrounds and activities within our daily lives but with videos, we can view the contents clearly. For example, it will be easier to understand the way a person in other part of the world dances by watching a documentary, rather than reading a description. Furthermore, technological advancement has allowed us to film a lengthy video just by our smartphones or tablets, which are more convienient and less time-consuming than producing written papers. In addition, we can capture everything we observe at the moment without having to memorize it.
On the other hand, I believe that written documents bring about an immense amount of positive impact that can not be replaced by other tools. It is clear that before electronic devices and cameras are invented, every knowledge about the way of living that the prior generation has perceived is written in books and journals. Thus, these papers contain valuable sources of information and hold historical meanings in terms of the global culture.
As a result, we should research and study carefully about these documents before digital ones. Moreover, in written papers, all the thoughts and opinions of the authors are depicted within the words, which can be more informative and insightful than typical videos. Hence, it is more worthwile for students or researchers to learn about other cultures through the pages.
In conclusion, while some individuals regard videos as a more effective method to learn about other parts of the world rather than written papers, I would advocate that studying the diverse ways of living via writtings is more favourable.
- Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 89
- The diagram below shows how a solar powered water pump works Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 61
- Mobile phone and the internet could have many benefits for old people However this age group uses technology the least What are the benefits for old people of using mobile phones and the internet How can we encourage them to use this new technology 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[1]
Message: The adjective superior is normally used with 'to'.
Suggestion: to
...ges, I do not agree that it is superior than written ones. On the one hand, it is...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1783625731 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83930173617 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.433441279 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336433856712 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103701612781 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740979721002 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189202534698 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521747920125 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.