Overall, it is apparent that the average amount of carbon dioxide emissions per person in Britain continuously dominated among the four nations, while the equivalent figure for Portugal ranked the lowest over the period shown. Besides, the number of emissions in Sweden and Italy saw a clear upward trend, compared with that of the other two countries.
In 1967, Portuguese people released the fewest amount of carbon dioxide, with a figure of about 1 metric tonne. In the following 40 years, the quantity of carbon dioxide emissions increased remarkably, peaking at approximately 5 metric tonnes in 2007. Similarly, an obvious increment can also be seen in the amount of this type of greenhouse gas emissions in Italy, almost doubling from 4 in 1967 to roughly 8 metric tonnes in 2007.
By contrast, there was a downward trend in the UK, as the number of emissions declined from about 11 to less than 9 metric tonnes throughout this period of time. Interestingly, in spite of the fluctuation of around 3 metric tonnes between 1967 and 1987, the figure for carbon dioxide emissions per person had decreased since then , falling to about 7 metric tonnes in 2007.
- Some university now offer their courses on Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development 78
- The graph below shows the fertility rate of women in six Gulf countries 73
- The table below shows the prices of a cup of coffee in 6 cities in Australia in 2010 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years
- The charts below show the percentage of people aged 23 65 in different occupations in one UK town Ashby and in the UK as a whole in 2008 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ss than 9 metric tonnes throughout this period of time. Interestingly, in spite of the fluctua...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 330, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ions per person had decreased since then , falling to about 7 metric tonnes in 200...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, similarly, so, then, while, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98461538462 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69607980483 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605128205128 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.1237880483 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.857142857 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8571428571 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20160184374 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954240840707 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496108682561 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142204593125 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270417214259 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.