Nowadays in many countries, both women and men work full-time. Logically, women and men should share household tasks equally. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Asymmetry between female and male about working for a long time was attracted public attention. Simply, both of female and male have proportion to do some workhome. I agree with this notion and think that to do a job it is not depend on gender.
First of all, high level of need make everyone to got a lof of money. In other words, each person should work to viability for a long time. By job they can provide every provision and improve family economic as a result the family become welfare. For example, Raffi Ahmad is a work hard and have clean wealth more than 100 Million Rupiahs, from this we can see his family very happy and what his wife and son need everything was provided. Thats why work is line life of someone and money can guarantee happiness of someone.
Secondly, equilibrium of workhome can invent relationship among partner. When someone in love and have a little family they must able to construct cooperation in several aspects such as divide task workhome. On the other hand, through this task relation of someone will survive in future. For example, my parrents was married since 1998 and always together in all conditions, when at home my father have task to playing with my brother, and sometimes made some cuisine for my mother and this is the key to creat a good connection. Thus, will not arise fight in couple life.
To conclude, every time someone or couple should make schedule to divide task and make it balance between male and female.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-10 | Desi Sari Ayuni | 61 | view |
- Some people regard work as the most important thing in life and have little interest in anything else Other people are most enthusiastic about their hobbies and leisure interest than their jobs Discuss both of the attitudes and give your opinion 73
- Pie chart The amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 2016 11
- The Table illustrates The proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009 73
- Today s schools should teach their students how to survive financially in the world today To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Some people think tv is good for us while others argues that television has many disadvantages Discuss both views 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...on and think that to do a job it is not depend on gender. First of all, high level of...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 439, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...e and son need everything was provided. Thats why work is line life of someone and mo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...s task relation of someone will survive in future. For example, my parrents was married s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 404, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'tasked'.
Suggestion: tasked
...conditions, when at home my father have task to playing with my brother, and sometim...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, such as, as a result, first of all, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1211.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6398467433 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34862462708 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609195402299 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0033358428 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100407429128 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366071713057 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324528687842 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0684730723561 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278593410195 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...on and think that to do a job it is not depend on gender. First of all, high level of...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 439, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...e and son need everything was provided. Thats why work is line life of someone and mo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...s task relation of someone will survive in future. For example, my parrents was married s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 404, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'tasked'.
Suggestion: tasked
...conditions, when at home my father have task to playing with my brother, and sometim...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, such as, as a result, first of all, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1211.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6398467433 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34862462708 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609195402299 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0033358428 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100407429128 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366071713057 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324528687842 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0684730723561 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278593410195 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.