The chart compares data about the proportion of consumer expenditure categorized by three items in 5 countries: Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and Turkey in 2002.
It is apparent that the largest percentage of outlay went on food, beverage, and tobacco. The lowest spending could be seen in the category of leisure and education,
Moving to a more detailed analysis, Turkey spent the most on food, drink, and tobacco, at 32,14%. The expenditure of those in Ireland was also high, with 28,97%, compared to Sweden's outlay which spent at least, with a mere 15,17%. Besides, the figure for those in Italy and Spain were 16,36% and 18,8% respectively.
In contrast, the expenditure on leisure and education accounted for under 5% in all countries. While Turkey spent most on these items, at 4,35%, the lowest point was seen in Spain with only 1,98%. Finally, clothing and footwear were the third category of consumer goods and outlays for those items were between 9% in Italy and 5,4% in Sweden. The rest of the countries averaged around 6,5%
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- the graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross section of 100 000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994 98 The second chart shows their destinations over the same period 78
- The line graph shows the income of four cafes in New York over last year 11
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, so, third, while, at least, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98275862069 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52633768226 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609195402299 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3091576677 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3333333333 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0805369616997 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0345183038517 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047644619326 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0596068755876 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535516625933 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.