youth is more active now as compare to past . agree or disagree
It is critically important that people should contribute their time and effort to help the communities. There is no shortage of opinions that the younger generation do not pay attention to help society. But I have a different belief. I would go in favor of the statement that youth plays an important role in helping a community. I prefer this because of two reasons which I will elaborate in the following paragraphs.
First of all, young people are more educated nowadays and they support the population because they have extensive knowledge about technology. In contrast, the younger people in the past were not smart enough and did not know much about technical information. So, with the help of technological sources like the internet they serve the human population in different ways. This is best exemplified by my personal experience. My cousin is a doctor by profession. He also knows how to use social media efficiently. Recently he started his own channel on you tube where he provides healthy tips and remedies to the people with no charge. If my cousin had no awareness about the internet then he would not have been able to provide useful information to the public.
Secondly, young adults are more enthusiastic these days and they want to participate in different kinds of volunteering services. However, in the past the younger adults did not have these kinds of services available. Hence, the young people take more time to be a part of these programs. As a result, the people in our societies can get more benefits. For instance, about ten years ago, when I was studying psychology in my college, I got a chance to take part in counseling people about their personal problems. I was so excited and I tried my best to provide excellent services to the public. That really boosted my confidence and I also felt peace in my heart.
In conclusion, I have a firm belief that young people in a human population take the time out of their busy lives to help others in a community. This is because they are more informed of technological methods and also because they want to provide social services to people in need.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-25 | Umme Abiha | 3 | view |
- Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams 70
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts 60
- It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts 60
- YOUR FRIEND WANTS TO LOSE WEIGHT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE 70
- Because modern life is very complex it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 634, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... remedies to the people with no charge. If my cousin had no awareness about the in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8097826087 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76612282654 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510869565217 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8856079718 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.4545454545 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7272727273 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.68181818182 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0633387744019 0.236089414692 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0196194304832 0.076458572812 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.026428686352 0.0737576698707 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0388747009975 0.150856017488 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173129393474 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.