The line graph gives data about the number of users of five different communication services worldwide from 1998 to 2008.
The line graph gives the information about the figure for people using 5 alternative methods to communicate all over the world between 1998 and 2008.
It is clear that the number of users of all services increased during the period shown. In addition, the users of cellular phone service held the first position at the end of the period, despite its second highest statistic in 1998.
In 1998, about 15% of people used landline service to interact with others, then this data reached a peak of 20% in 2006 before a slight drop of 1% in 2008. Moreover, although the values of cellular phone service and Internet service started at the same point at about 5%, that of cellular phone surpassed landline service in 2002 and led in global communication service with 65%, while the figure for Internet service went up moderately by 21% after 10 years.
Furthermore, the fixed broadband and mobile broadband had similar trends in their users’ numbers over the 10-year period. To be more specific, there were marginal growths to 4% in the data of fixed and mobile broadbands, but these services had no users in the first 6 years.
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2010 to 2014 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85051546392 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46571236875 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60824742268 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.7908741582 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.428571429 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 5.23603664747 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324557903025 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142906371642 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613201799342 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185617625093 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583991763486 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.