Many young people who leave school hold a negative attitude towards learning. Why does this happen? What are the solutions?
In recent years, there was an increasing number of youngsters who disliked learning after graduation. From my personal perspective, the main reason for this above-mentioned phenomenon is the less interesting subjects at school, and this problem will be solved if the curriculums are redesigned in more appropriate ways.
To begin with, the negative behaviors of school leavers are mainly caused by tedious curriculums and unattractive teaching methods. Firstly, the curriculums of many subjects are mainly built based on the concentration on abstract knowledge and theories and the underestimation of student’s initiatives, so students are more likely to feel that the lecturers are more difficult, resulting in enormous pressure about study on those youngsters. Secondly, there are some rigid teaching styles that make students feel less motivated, especially traditional methods forcing them to follow an old and inflexible way of learning. A salient example of this is that a survey conducted in Nigeria found that students were less fond of lessons that mainly focused on theory such as linguistics and were delivered in conventional teaching methods. Therefore, subjects that are not interesting and impressive are the main culprits behind the adverse attitude towards learning in school droppers.
Furthermore, this issue can be solved if the approach to subjects is more appropriate. In detail, the practical lessons must be included in the curriculum so students have opportunities to put theory into practice. Moreover, another solution is to alter the teaching strategy by adding some recreational games and visual aids into lessons in order to stimulate the excitement in the classes. For example, after applying the new teaching methods and combining practical classes, students in Sweden achieved greater academic performance and they totally appreciated the knowledge they had learnt at school. Hence, these solutions are able to encourage students' delight in study.
In conclusion, impractical courses and conservative teaching ways are primary reasons for the poor opinion of school graduates about studying, however, this issue can be tackled by the application of down-to-earth projects and engaging teaching techniques.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-11 | Dương Ái Nhi | 61 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | Dương Ái Nhi | 61 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | Duong Gia Han | 89 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | ngocminhho | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | TranthikimNgoc | 89 | view |
- Many young people who leave school hold a negative attitude towards learning Why does this happen What are the solutions 84
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 84
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with that statement 78
- The table below shows daily oil production in 4 countries from 2010 to 2014 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1917.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7223880597 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08139524542 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585074626866 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.183842098 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.461538462 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7692307692 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9230769231 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125090157062 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473927814538 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400570848625 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0750957477372 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259020087036 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.