Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Decision-making and individual autonomy are fundamental pillars within contemporary society. In our increasingly chaotic and fast-paced world, the ability to make wise and precise decisions has become crucial. A contentious question often raised pertains to whether children should be allowed to make autonomous decisions or whether they should seek guidance from their parents. While some individuals argue in favor of parental involvement, I firmly believe that independent decision-making is more advantageous for students. In order to substantiate my viewpoint, the subsequent paragraphs will provide a brief overview of the most compelling reasons.
First and foremost, one compelling rationale supporting my standpoint is the multitude of opportunities available today for children to gain firsthand experience. The essence of an independent society lies in individuals' capacity to act and think autonomously, separate from their parents' influence. Given the contemporary nature of our society, it has become increasingly feasible for individuals to acquire personal experiences through trial and error. To illustrate this point further, I can draw upon my own personal experience. During my adolescence, my family made the decision for me to study and live in a different city. It was an arduous experience to leave behind my family and friends, and navigate unfamiliar situations. However, the ability to independently forge my own path had clear benefits. I acquired valuable life skills and learned how to overcome challenges.
The second rationale supporting this perspective is grounded in the notion that when students learn how to think independently, they enhance their cognitive abilities. By fostering independent thinking and creating an environment that empowers children to make their own decisions, parents enable the development of crucial skills such as problem-solving. Trusting children with autonomy can contribute to the creation of a better society, one that values independent thought and critical reasoning, both of which are essential in today's world.
In conclusion, due to the aforementioned reasons, fostering independent thinking can greatly benefit students by enhancing their cognitive abilities and enabling them to overcome life's challenges. It is anticipated that when society fosters an environment in which parents grant their children the autonomy to make their own decisions, the quality of life for individuals will significantly improve.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-05-10 | hesami | 73 | view |
2023-05-10 | hesami | 86 | view |
2023-03-28 | sonyeoso | 73 | view |
2023-02-18 | reza_fattahi | 70 | view |
2022-12-14 | subashdevkota | 85 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examples to su 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examples to su 86
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2131.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88674033149 4.8611393121 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29625617681 2.67179642975 123% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574585635359 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7567408591 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.388888889 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196676299493 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610263751682 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465755228529 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129190306307 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359431532773 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 58.1214874552 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.1575268817 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 10.9000537634 155% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2131.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88674033149 4.8611393121 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29625617681 2.67179642975 123% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574585635359 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7567408591 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.388888889 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196676299493 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610263751682 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465755228529 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129190306307 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359431532773 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 58.1214874552 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.1575268817 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 10.9000537634 155% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.