People’s opinions differ as to whether or not raising taxes on the industrial sector will solve environmental problem. While such a measure can reduce contamination by discouraging industries from polluting activities, I believe that raising people's consciousness about environmental protection and imposing heavy penalties for environment violations would be more feasible solutions to address the root causes of these issues.
On the one hand, increasing taxes on numerous industries can decrease pollution levels to some extent. Several industries that sell low-priced products ignore waste treatment processes and use hardzard chemicals in their production processes. Therefore, raising heavy taxes on these plants would serve as a deterrent against them from polluting activities by forcing them to increase their product prices or use environmentally friendly alternatives. Several EU countries, including Germany and Netherlands, have reduced contamination by implementing carbon tax on their industries and installing cleaner technologies.
Despite the mentioned above, environmental pollution can be caused by a variety of factors, including poor public awareness of environmental protection and loose laws against polluting practices. Therefore, there are two primary measures that can be taken to mitigate these issues. Chief of these is that the government should run campaigns to raise awareness among citizens about the detrimental impacts of environmental pollution and the importance of Earth protection. These workshops should be carried out in schools as compulsory subjects in the curriculum. Additionally, imposing strict laws and punishment should be introduced as a deterrent against those breaking the laws by heavy monetary fines and enforcement of closing down businesses. This will discourage them from repeating polluting activities, ultimately reducing pollution.
In conclusion, although increasing taxation on industries may reduce environmental pollution to some extent, I believe that stricter penalties and public awareness of the importance of planet protection would be more effective measures to solve the underlying causes of these issues. I am also convinced that once these approaches are implemented, there will be more people to obey these new regulations, creating a fresher and cleaner environment for everyone.
- The charts give information about world forests in five different regions 61
- Some people say that we do not need printed newspapers anymore To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003 2006 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: WHETHER[4]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; whether or not; as to whether
People’s opinions differ as to whether or not raising taxes on the industrial sector ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...ting activities, I believe that raising peoples consciousness about environmental prote...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 843, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tivities, ultimately reducing pollution. In conclusion, although increasing taxat...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, therefore, while, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2033.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 6.06865671642 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25468149895 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558208955224 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.7657210333 49.4020404114 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.384615385 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7692307692 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38461538462 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187922411249 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0728944170677 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677517521548 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130832884622 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480000391155 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.0946893788 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 50.2224549098 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.22 12.4159519038 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.