Today food travels thousands of miles from the farm to the consumer. Some people say that
it would be better for the economy & environment if people ate food produced by local farmers. Would
the advantages of this idea outweigh the disadvantages?
As food at farms has to be delivered thousands of miles before reaching consumers, there is an opinion that the economy and environment will be beneficial when people consume food from local farmers. However, I personally believe the advantages of this point cannot outweigh disadvantages.
Firstly, the advantage of consuming local food is the profit it may bring to farmers. In particular, farmers can sell food directly to consumers instead of via traders, which minimizes the trading fee. As a result, farmers are likely to earn more money and improve their living standard. The second benefit is, less preservatives might be us ed as it does not take several days to deliver food anymore, which can in turn reduce the environmental pollutants. Also, without the delivery services, consumers may enjoy better prices from buying local food.
On the other hand, this issue can have lots of disadvantages, especially for consumers. Many jobs created from trading activities, such as transporters, retailers,... will be eliminated because there is no need for them when farmers can now sell food themselves. Having less jobs can cause the unemployment rate to be higher, which then impacts negatively on the economic growth as a whole. Moreover, each region will have certain conditions for producing only some types of food due to the differences in climate, labor forces and soil quality. This mea ns not all types of food can achieve high quality as consumers expect, leading to dissatisfaction and substandard supply in the local market.
In conclusion, it takes miles to provide daily food to consumers. Although eating food from local farmers has some advantages, its negative sides on the economy and benefits of consumers should be considered more seriously.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-14 | Cholley | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-03 | maiphuong0610 | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-27 | maiphuong0610 | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-27 | maiphuong0610 | 84 | view |
- Today food travels thousands of miles from the farm to the consumer Some people say that it would be better for the economy environment if people ate food produced by local farmers Would the advantages of this idea outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries brings many positive effects Others say it causes the loss of national identities Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- A few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries while the use of others is rapidly declining Is it a positive or negative development 84
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the government rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Research has shown that the transportation of products and people are the main source of pollution Some people believe the government should be in charge of this while others believe it is the fault of individuals Discuss both views and give your opinion 92
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is point cannot outweigh disadvantages. Firstly, the advantage of consuming loca...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun preservatives is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...living standard. The second benefit is, less preservatives might be us ed as it does...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... better prices from buying local food. On the other hand, this issue can have l...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 163, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...ivities, such as transporters, retailers,... will be eliminated because there is n...
^^
Line 6, column 271, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun jobs is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...rs can now sell food themselves. Having less jobs can cause the unemployment rate t...
^^^^
Line 6, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...w sell food themselves. Having less jobs can cause the unemployment rate to be hi...
^^
Line 6, column 552, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ate, labor forces and soil quality. This mea ns not all types of food can achieve...
^^
Line 6, column 700, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...substandard supply in the local market. In conclusion, it takes miles to provide...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, as to, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2676056338 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89689242415 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62676056338 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8560877541 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372411587516 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116664734227 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835123697772 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244493625682 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758200483229 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is point cannot outweigh disadvantages. Firstly, the advantage of consuming loca...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun preservatives is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...living standard. The second benefit is, less preservatives might be us ed as it does...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... better prices from buying local food. On the other hand, this issue can have l...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 163, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...ivities, such as transporters, retailers,... will be eliminated because there is n...
^^
Line 6, column 271, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun jobs is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...rs can now sell food themselves. Having less jobs can cause the unemployment rate t...
^^^^
Line 6, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...w sell food themselves. Having less jobs can cause the unemployment rate to be hi...
^^
Line 6, column 552, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ate, labor forces and soil quality. This mea ns not all types of food can achieve...
^^
Line 6, column 700, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...substandard supply in the local market. In conclusion, it takes miles to provide...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, as to, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2676056338 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89689242415 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62676056338 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8560877541 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372411587516 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116664734227 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835123697772 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244493625682 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758200483229 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.