In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employees the option of working a four-day workweek for four-fifths (80 percent)of their normal pay would benefit the economy as a whole as well as the individual companies and the employees who decided to take the option. The shortened workweek would increase company profits because employees would feel more rested and alert, and as a result, they would make fewer costly errors in their work. Hiring more staff to ensure that the same amount of work would be accomplished would not result in additional payroll costs because four-day employees would only be paid 80 percent of the normal rate. In the end, companies would have fewer overworked and error-prone employees for the same money, which would increase company profits. For the country as a whole, one of the primary benefits of offering this option to employees is that it would reduce unemployment rates. If many full-time employees started working fewer hours, some of their workload would have to be shifted to others. Thus, for every four employees who went on an 80 percent week, a new employee could be hired at the 80 percent rate. Finally, the option of a four-day workweek would be better for individual employees. Employees who could afford a lower salary in exchange for more free time could improve the quality of their lives by spending the extra time with their families, pursuing private interests, or enjoying leisure activities.
The reading text and lecture are both deal with the new proposal of 4 day work week in the company. The author of this article feels that this new opinion of the worker will beneficial for both employer and employ. The lacturer dispute the claims made by the author. His position is just opposite of the view of writer.
According to the reading text, this shorter work will make company more profitable and reduced the number of the error done by the employ. Article mention that, by this way worker feels more alertness and restfull life. The view is challenged by the lecturer, He claim that, because of this new proposal company would spent more money on recruitement and training . Additionally, He argues that, employer require more spaces and computer to accomodate that new employ.
Secondly, The author suggests that It will reduced the unemployment rate in the country. In the article, it is stated that company owner required more worker to copue up the market demand. However, Speaker asserst that, he goes on to say that this new systerm will reduced the job availability in the market. Further he explain that, Ownwe will expect more work in shorter time from the employ. It will make the worklife unpleasant.
Finally, The author mention that, It will improve the quality of life of the worker. He says that, Because of this new work schedule Worker can spent more time with his family and friends. The lecture
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | Hello GRE | 80 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | TANVIR SIDDIKE MOIN | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | nusybah | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-01 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-01 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'week' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'weeks'.
Suggestion: weeks
...eal with the new proposal of 4 day work week in the company. The author of this arti...
^^^^
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...eneficial for both employer and employ. The lacturer dispute the claims made by the...
^^^
Line 2, column 263, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'claims'.
Suggestion: claims
... view is challenged by the lecturer, He claim that, because of this new proposal comp...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 318, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'spend'
Suggestion: spend
...ause of this new proposal company would spent more money on recruitement and training...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 363, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... more money on recruitement and training . Additionally, He argues that, employer ...
^^
Line 3, column 44, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'reduce'
Suggestion: reduce
...ondly, The author suggests that It will reduced the unemployment rate in the country. I...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'worker' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: worker
...t is stated that company owner required more worker to copue up the market demand. However,...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'reduce'
Suggestion: reduce
...es on to say that this new systerm will reduced the job availability in the market. Fur...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'explains'.
Suggestion: explains
... availability in the market. Further he explain that, Ownwe will expect more work in sh...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, second, secondly, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1183.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82857142857 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35781118424 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489795918367 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 363.6 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7607335042 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8666666667 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 7.06452816374 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0988353404048 0.272083759551 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0369571082556 0.0996497079465 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411712491197 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0690116515885 0.162205337803 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269961211214 0.0443174109184 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.3589403974 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.