The argument claims that the government should promote a new kind of millet which contains more vitamin A to deal with vitamin A deficiency among poor people of Tagus. However, the argument includes significant logical holes making the suggestion implausible. Thus, the prediction that impoverished people would no longer suffer from vitamin A deficiency needs some corrections.
First of all, the organization is falsely assuming impoverished people would actually have a chance to consume enough amount of the new kind of millet. Often, poor families suffer from nutrition deficiency due to their inability to provide for food. If this is the case, vitamin A deficiency would not be conquered even with vitamin A reinforced millet because those people would not get a chance to enjoy the millet. Unless the government finds a way to guarantee the impoverished an enough amount of millet, the new breed of millet is not expected to help the poor people.
Moreover, the argument does not mention how similar the new breed of millet is to the original one. In deciding which food to eat, the taste plays an important role. If the taste is different, people would stick to the old one because they are used to it. The arguer's prediction would valid only if the taste, quality, and even color of the millet are very similar to those of the original type. Thus, the arguer is required to prove that the new millet is not significantly different from the old one.
Vitamins are very sensitive that sometimes they are destroyed with a little bit of heat. That is why doctors often recommend eating vegetables uncooked. In the argument, it is assumed that the vitamin A in the newly developed millet would be preserved after cooking it into a staple food in Tagus. Even if the millet is ripe with vitamin A, it is no use if it is all obliterated before consumption. Therefore, the international development organization should figure out a way to pique the millet without harming the nutrition contained.
Developing a new type of millet is a laudable effort of the government to extinguish the vitamin A deficiency among the impoverished population. However, the arguer's prediction is very unlikely to realize because his current argument contains some serious errors.
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 68
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the ext 80
- The following appeared in a memorandum written by the chairperson of the West Egg Town Council."Two years ago, consultants predicted that West Egg's landfill, which is used for garbage disposal, would be completely filled within five years. During the pas 70
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist."Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rat 80
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In d 60
--------------------
argument 1 -- not OK
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- not OK
--------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 2.0 out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 377 350
No. of Characters: 1849 1500
No. of Different Words: 170 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.406 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.905 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.754 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 141 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 100 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 70 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 47 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.842 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.055 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.632 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.339 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.553 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.072 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5