The pie graph illustrates the highest important causes making agricultural land impact. Besides that, the table indicates influence to three region of the world in the year 1990s.
Overall, It is obvious that the percentage of deforestation, over - grazing and over - cultivation stood at the most proportion of worldwide land degradation. In addition, the region which occurred erosion was Europe.
Firstly, the proportion of over - grazing, deforestation and over - cultivation were dramatically stood at 35%, 30% and 28% while the others was 7%.
Secondly, the total land was degraded in Europe highly accounted for 23%, in which that of deforestation is the highest one at 9,8%. Oceania was the region had total land degraded at 13% while the proportion of over - grazing highly accounted for 11.3 % but these was over - cultivation caused no damage. North America had the lowest proportion of arable land damaged at 5%. The biggest cause was over - cultivation at 3.3% and the least was the removal of forest at 0.2 %.
- Cases of bullying in school are increasing and worsening What do you think are the causes of this How can we tackle this issue 61
- IELTS wrting task 1 test 1 cambridge ielts 8 11
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- Cases of bullying in school are increasing and worsening What do you think are the causes of this How can we tackle this issue 56
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'region' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'regions'.
Suggestion: regions
... the table indicates influence to three region of the world in the year 1990s. Overal...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, second, secondly, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20731707317 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90239036404 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567073170732 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4682007525 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8888888889 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.