The bar chart demonstrates the proportion of estates possession and rented households in England and wales over the period of a century from 1918 and 2011. Overall, the percentage of owned estates experienced an upward trend while the figure for rented houses witnessed a downward trend.
Having looked at the bar chart for more details, it is clear that from 1918 to 1938, there was a decrease of roughly 10 percent from around 77 percent to under 70 percent. Its figure remained stable to 1953, before falling steadily and hit a low of nearly 30 percent in the year 2001. Notably, 10 years later, the proportion of rented households soared slightly to 35 percent.
Focusing on the rest data given, the figure for possessed household was roughly 20 percent, which was less than 3 times compared with the rented household’s percentage in 1918. From 1939 to 1953, the percentage of owned households stagnated at over 30 percent, followed by a persistent increase of 20 percent in 1971, which was equal to the figure for rented housholds in the same year. Significantly, the proportion of rented estates peaked at approximately 70 percent in 2011 before declining relatively to 65 percent.
- All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some educationalists argue that non exam art based subjects such as music drama art and craft should be compulsory in the secondary school curriculum They believe that activities such as these can improve overall academic performance To what extent do you 56
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- In many countries around the world rural people are moving to cities so the population in the countryside is decreasing Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 84
- The Chart below shows the value of one country s export in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 997.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01005025126 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77445190882 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562814070352 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8050275799 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.625 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156136442029 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835126310702 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626676011133 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12740717158 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638227371545 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.