Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to reduce air pollution is for the government to raise the cost of fuel?
Many people think increasing the cost of the fuel will not aid in reduction of air pollution, and it will raise their spending. Although i understand their point of view, I agree that, the best way to reduce air pollution is for the government to raise the cost of the fuel because the uses of the cars will produce many gases that affect the human health, and it will reduce the evaporation of the gas into the atmosphere by reducing traffic.
First, increasing the cost of the fuel will lead the human healthier ad go greener. For example, my sister never walked to her work, which is 15 minute walking from our home. She is driving her car daily to her work. As a result, she gains a lot of weight , and the doctor tells her that she should walk one hour daily. On contrary, when the government decided to increase the cost of the fuel, many people will encourage to walk. Moreover walking is very good for people heath. It leads the blood circulate well in our body, and more oxygen will go to our lungs, so it has a good impact on our health.
Next, it will reduce the evaporation of the gas into atmosphere. For example, using the cars daily will release a lot of the harmful gases to the environment. In addition many people will encourage to use their bikes , so less gases will go to the atmosphere. For example, in my country , the government decided to increase the cost of the fuel. at first, many people got upset. Then they used their bikes to go for shopping or their works, and many other shared their cars. In instance, me and my friends shared cars to go to our works. we were using carpools lines. As a result the air pollution was reduced in my country by reducing the number of cars used in the roads.
To put everything in a nut shell, according to the reasons mentioned above, i believe that, the increasing price of the fuel will reduce the air pollution, and i encourage all the people to leave their car for a while and used another kind of transportation. Why not try to ride your bike and go to your work? i think when you try it you will never regret it.
- TPO 30 – Integrated 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news sources. 50
- your job has more effect on your happiness than your social life does. 40
- Tpo 35 integrated 70
- TPO27 (independent)If people have the opportunity of take a secured job they should take it right away, rather than waiting for a job that is more satisfying. 50
Comments
What you mean by a noun
What you mean by a noun ,pleural, common not follow by a noun ,singular, common refer to people and health ??
When noun 2 belongs to noun 1
When noun 2 belongs to noun 1, then don't put them parallel like:
noun1 + noun 2
should be:
people's heath
me and my friends shared cars
my friends and I shared cars
Sentence: Moreover walking is very good for people heath.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to people and heath
flaws:
No. of Words: 389 while No. of Different Words: 170
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 389 350
No. of Characters: 1643 1500
No. of Different Words: 170 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.441 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.224 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.249 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 87 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 60 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 39 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 27 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.611 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.861 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.339 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.504 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.171 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5