Young people who commit crimes should be treated in the same way as adults by authorities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The treatment of young individuals who commit crimes is a complex and contentious issue. Some argue that authorities should treat them in the same manner as adults, holding them accountable for their actions. However, I firmly disagree with this perspective, as I believe that young offenders require a distinct approach that considers their developmental stage and the potential for rehabilitation.
Young people are in a crucial stage of physical, emotional, and cognitive development. Unlike adults, their decision-making processes and impulse control are still evolving. Treating them as if they are fully mature individuals overlooks these developmental differences. The criminal justice system should recognize the malleability of young minds and prioritize interventions that foster growth and rehabilitation. A rigid, adult-centric approach may hinder rather than facilitate the positive development of young offenders.
Additionally, young offenders often possess a greater capacity for rehabilitation. Imposing the same harsh penalties as those applied to adults can have detrimental effects on their mental health and future prospects. Educational programs, counseling, and community service are more suitable interventions for young individuals. By addressing the root causes of their criminal behavior and providing opportunities for personal growth, authorities can contribute to the long-term well-being of these individuals and reduce the likelihood of recidivism.
In conclusion, I believe that treating young people who commit crimes in the same way as adults overlooks their unique developmental needs and potential for rehabilitation. A more nuanced approach that combines accountability with rehabilitative measures is essential for fostering positive change and preventing the cycle of criminal behavior.
- Companies use different ways to increase sales What different ways do companies use to increase sales What is the most effective 56
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 56
- In many countries people like to eat a wider range of food than can be grown in their local place Therefore much of the food people eat today has to come from other regions Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh disadvantages 78
- In many countries the number of animals and plants is declining Why do you think it is happening How to solve this issue 11
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, so, still, well, in conclusion, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 41.998997996 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.21568627451 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41222444502 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58431372549 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8709501568 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.214285714 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250085706843 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828757359097 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726882099089 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162036110106 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644598333142 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.8 12.4159519038 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.6 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, so, still, well, in conclusion, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 41.998997996 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1585.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.21568627451 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41222444502 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58431372549 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8709501568 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.214285714 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250085706843 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828757359097 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726882099089 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162036110106 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644598333142 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.8 12.4159519038 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.6 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.