The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in Calgary, 2000- 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares the yearly income of three bakeries in London from 2000 to 2010. Overall, it is apparent that the amount of yearly income of Lovely Loaves decreased significantly throughout the years, while there was a significant increase in the amount of yearly revenue obtained by Robbie Bakery.
In the initial year, Lovely Loaves’s annual income was above 80,000 and then, it fluctuated between 80,000 and 96,000 before dropping substantially to just below 60,000 in 2007. After that, annual income of Lovely Loaves declined to just about 40,000 in 2008 and followed by almost no change in the last two years. In comparison to Lovely Loaves, Robbie Bakery annual income was initially about 56,000 and this figure remained unchanged for about six years. Then, the figure climbed to 60,000 and exceeded that of Lovely Loaves’s yearly revenue in 2006. Between 2007 and 2010, the Lovely Loaves annual earning grew substantially, reaching the peak of about 100,000 in 2010.
Moving to Bernie Buns, annual earning of this bakery was the lowest (20,000), and this figure doubled in the following three years before it stabilized at just about 39,000 from 2003 to 2003. In 2007, Bernie’s Buns yearly income escalated to above 40,000 and then it significantly inclined to about 60,000 in the following years. Finally, in 2010, the Bernie Buns annual income finished second (above 60,000).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-26 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
- Some children find learning history at school very exciting while but many others think it is very boring In what ways can history be brought to life for all school children 56
- The diagram below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- People are living in a throwaway society using things for a short time and then throwing them away What are the causes of this What problems does it lead to 84
- People are living in a throwaway society using things for a short time and then throwing them away What are the causes of this What problems does it lead to 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 674, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ching the peak of about 100,000 in 2010. Moving to Bernie Buns, annual earning of...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1176.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18061674009 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42436480002 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506607929515 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.2535092046 43.030603864 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.666666667 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2222222222 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131225272454 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746290242252 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709621608867 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0984262415281 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00613930316596 0.0819641961636 7% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.