The bar chart below shows the popularity of well-known Instagram accounts in 2011 and 2021.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart demonstrates the popularity of renowned people on Instagram including Cristiano Ronaldo, The Rock, Ariana Grande, Kylie Jenner and Selena Gomez between 2018 and 2021.
Overview, the figure for all influencers rose significantly in the period of 3 years. Additionally, Selena Gomez was the most prevalent person among 5 celebrities, which was then taken place by Cristiano Ronaldo.
In 2018, Selena Gomez was the most influential person who had the greatest number of followers with the figure being recorded at about 130 million, followed by Cristiano Ronaldo and Ariana Grande with a similar figure (120) which was lower than Selena Gomez’s followers below approximately 10 million. The Rock and Kylie Jenner was less influential than others who had the least number of followers on social media application (Instagram) with the respective figures being at about 90 million and 100 million.
In the next 3 years, Cristiano Ronaldo’s followers soared sharply to roughly 310 million and became the most influential celebrity on Instagram. Similarly, The Rock, Ariana Grande and Kylie Jenner witnessed an approximately double increase in number of followers to the same figure in 2021 (250 million). Notably, the influence Selena Gomez also grew to roughly 249 million; however, its figure was the least compared to its counterparts.
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people believe that in a city the best way to travel is by car while other people argue that bicycles are a better way of travelling in a city 73
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in the USA Summarise the information by selecting and reporting and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The maps below show a science park in 2008 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1144.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42180094787 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82163712795 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559241706161 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0961076911 43.030603864 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.05122444705 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0285429951795 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423836781739 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0462769766633 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531607759116 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.