The table below shows the percentage of households with computers and Internet access in three different countries from 2005 to 2015. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table give inform about the rate of household with technology devices and internet access in three countries between 2005 and 2015.
Overall, it is evident the percentage of households that have technological accessibility in 2005 in UK was highest among three countries but India was lowest. However, it can be clearly if we look at the specific decline.
Look at the table chart in 2005, the rate of households that had technological accessibility in UK was highest among three countries ( 64%). Second higher after was USA (61%).However, in India was lowest and just had 9%. Meanwhile, in next five year is 2010. India had significantly increase when from 9% to 15%. USA and UK also have increased when from 61% to 70 and from 64% to 76%.
Look at the table chart in last year 2015, the percentage in UK was highest about 83%. It can be seen that the percentage of households in there always higher than other nations and people tend to be more technological accessibility. Meanwhile, USA stable about 79%. Finally, the percentage of households in India about 26%.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Other believe that there are health benefits of living in cities Discuss both views and give your opinions 78
- Some people think that the government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problem Give your option 73
- In some countries more and more are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reason for this How can people can research this 73
- The table shows the proportion of the workforce who are women and the proportion of managers who are women in five different countries Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below gives information on consumer spending items in five different countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in UK was highest among three countries 64%. Second higher after was USA 61%.How...
^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'increased'.
Suggestion: increased
...e year is 2010. India had significantly increase when from 9% to 15%. USA and UK also ha...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, look, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84699453552 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85695686251 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513661202186 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9401230397 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.9166666667 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.25 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215360383608 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839841721931 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0963458922117 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171626219269 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0974874458626 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.