do u agree or disagree with the following statement?
To improve the quality of education,universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
These days high salary of university professors is a controversial debate among the students. While some of the students believe that high salary is essential for professors others oppose to that attitude. As far as I am concerned I agree with spending more money on professor's salaries because of the following reasons.
Firstly, professors need to devote their time to studying and researching rather than gaining money from different ways. If we allocate sufficient money for them, they can spend much more time on new scientific researches. The professors who have financial problems can't focus on their works. Thus in universities there would not be any eagerness and motivation for scientific studies. Instead professors prefer to work on their own to solve their financial problems.
Secondly, due to personal aspect as a comparison to other jobs university professors have to study for long years to get PhD certificate in order to eligibility of being a university professor. Thus it is not fair that other types of jobs like technicians or engineer after two or four years studying in college and starting a career ealrier can gain more money than them.
At last, to have a high prestigious university owning high quality facilities and equipment are not enough. It is vital to have professors who are highly motivated and workaholic to guide the interested students to pursue their field of studying. Certainly one way for boosting their interest and stimulating their innovation and motivation is giving high amount of salary.
In conclusion, I strongly agree with raising the amount of money which given to professors as a salary due to increasing their motivation to spend more time on researching and studying.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-04-18 | parsboy3kc | 80 | view |
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'firstly', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.241042345277 0.229887763892 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.162866449511 0.158761421928 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.110749185668 0.0866891130778 128% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0521172638436 0.046263068375 113% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0553745928339 0.0685040099705 81% => OK
Prepositions: 0.127035830619 0.118717715034 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0553745928339 0.0351676179071 157% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.97104221389 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0553745928339 0.0309702414327 179% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.0521172638436 0.0887237588012 59% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0130293159609 0.0209618222197 62% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00977198697068 0.0139019557991 70% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1770.0 2387.08602151 74% => OK
No of words: 280.0 408.028673835 69% => More words wanted.
Chars per words: 6.32142857143 5.86048508987 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.48200974243 91% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.353571428571 0.338922669872 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.289285714286 0.251872472559 115% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.253571428571 0.174417080927 145% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.192857142857 0.112833075102 171% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97104221389 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 212.727598566 74% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564285714286 0.524397521467 108% => OK
Word variations: 58.2615982473 59.2087087015 98% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6684587814 68% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5533526081 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5769278974 48.84282405 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.428571429 120.699889404 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.5533526081 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.642857142857 0.644075263715 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 0 5.54480286738 0% => OK
Readability: 48.9285714286 45.7405998639 107% => OK
Elegance: 1.56626506024 1.45489161554 108% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362373840325 0.300154397459 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.104455381441 0.103427244359 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0800032636023 0.0752933317313 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.573017287447 0.497263757937 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.155782692967 0.151897553556 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139712594499 0.114077575197 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703264634084 0.0781384742642 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.231924500552 0.336927656856 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0625468844736 0.067059652881 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229987526239 0.210909579961 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672981399919 0.0618886996521 109% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8870967742 59% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.91756272401 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 8.42114695341 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.6433691756 81% => OK
--------------------------
Rates: 80 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 24 Out of 30