Political leaders are those who lead the society. They must have well-defined principles and objectives in order to support their stand. Their objectives must be concerned towards the welfare of the people. If they happen to compromise on their belief based on public opinion, then it will only lead to confusion on the part of their credibility. There are many examples in real time to illustrate that political leaders who have been stubborn in their opinion are remembered for a long time in the history.
First of all, take example of Mahatma Gandhi, who tried to liberate through non-violence, amidst lot of protests, is remembered even today by millions of Indians. This is solely because, Mahatma Gandhi has sticked to his belief throughout his lifetime and has achieved success too. Political leaders who adhere to a cause are venerated by the people and they become the cynosure. They are deemed as heroes by the people who in many ways try to emulate their behavior and consider them as their role models and they become icons in due course of time.
Secondly, political leaders who never comprise on the principles are considered to be credible and they can be trusted to eradicate the miseries of the people. Whereas if a political leader happens to heed to the desires of the people, then he will least likely be considered as an exemplary person; his morality will be doubted and ultimately he will turn out to be the most hated person in the society. Hence trust can be established in a leader, only when he moves according to the established principles and rarely does change them.
Finally, a leader is shaped up by his principles and objectives. At any point of time, if he changes his beliefs, then it will mar his position in the society and create chaos because people will not be able to discern his real character. For instance, Mahatma Gandhi can be rendered as the "Symbol of Peace" - because in no case, did he resort to violence; the current President of India - Dr.Manmohan Singh can be regarded as the "best economist cum politician" because he is always punctilious in making economic decisions in Political matters. Thus each and every leader is identified uniquely by their opinions and the principles that they adhere to.
Though consistency in sticking to principles and objectives is required, some may argue that, in exigent cases where no other alternatives exist, we may have to change the principles so as to suit the needs of the current population. It is true to a certain extent that, there is absolutely no use of keeping a principle which no longer does hold valid. As times are changing, the principles need to be changed. But they must not occur at the expense of people's suggestions. An effective leader is one who considers multiple points of view regarding a policy change, analyses their pros and cons, and finally arrives at a decision on whether to really manipulate the existing laws.
All in all, an effective leader in any society is identified by his commitments towards principles and objectives; it creates a clear picture of the leader and engenders trust on him in the minds of the people. He who stubbornly adheres to his belief is sure to create indelible impressions in the annals of the nation's history. Though, the leaders can afford to change the principles sometimes, it must never go against his established motives that defines his character. Therefore, great political leaders are always those who have established set of opinions.
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 79
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 62
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership. 50
- If rituals did not exist we have to invent them. We need ceremonies and rituals to help us define ourselves social and culturally. 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 406, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...e the most hated person in the society. Hence trust can be established in a leader, o...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 393, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Manmohan
...ce; the current President of India - Dr.Manmohan Singh can be regarded as the best econo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 545, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...conomic decisions in Political matters. Thus each and every leader is identified uni...
^^^^
Line 9, column 184, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...t, we may have to change the principles so as to suit the needs of the current populatio...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 313, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...elible impressions in the annals of the nations history. Though, the leaders can afford...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'finally', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'really', 'regarding', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'whereas', 'as to', 'for instance', 'first of all', 'it is true']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.223765432099 0.240241500013 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.182098765432 0.157235817809 116% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0555555555556 0.0880659088768 63% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0462962962963 0.0497285424764 93% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0679012345679 0.0444667217837 153% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.121913580247 0.12292977631 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0478395061728 0.0406280797675 118% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.72770882836 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0401234567901 0.030933414821 130% => OK
Particles: 0.00308641975309 0.0016655270985 185% => OK
Determiners: 0.0956790123457 0.0997080785238 96% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0262345679012 0.0249443105267 105% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0200617283951 0.0148568991511 135% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3508.0 2732.02544248 128% => OK
No of words: 595.0 452.878318584 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89579831933 6.0361032391 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93888872473 4.58838876751 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.371428571429 0.366273622748 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.285714285714 0.280924506359 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.189915966387 0.200843997647 95% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.132773109244 0.132149295362 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72770882836 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 219.290929204 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484033613445 0.48968727796 99% => OK
Word variations: 59.3851789956 55.4138127331 107% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6194690265 121% => OK
Sentence length: 23.8 23.380412469 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.523551538 59.4972553346 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.32 141.124799967 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 23.380412469 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.674092028746 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 52.3714285714 51.4728631049 102% => OK
Elegance: 1.328125 1.64882698954 81% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.510063666214 0.391690518653 130% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.116247677547 0.123202303941 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0719539228103 0.077325440228 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.520049782 0.547984918172 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.139083852755 0.149214159877 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193236859317 0.161403998019 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739319950026 0.0892212321368 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.398088466103 0.385218514788 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0609634488856 0.0692045440612 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.34658515756 0.275328986314 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501080367012 0.0653680567796 77% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.30420353982 151% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88274336283 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 3.66592920354 218% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 2.70907079646 258% => OK
Total topic words: 22.0 13.5995575221 162% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.