Perhaps, no century witnessed more progress in technology than the 20th century did. Not surprisingly, public awareness regarding the impacts on this trend has increased significantly over the last decades. Some people have been argued that it causes children to be less creative. While I do not tend to refute such a view, I believe it can not be generalized to all cases.
The first point to support this is that maturity and fast pace of technology, accompanied with different applications, have paved the ways for a wide range of facilities which lead to boost people's intelligence. In the past, children could only play chess or bridge with their peers. Nowadays, thanks to World Wide Web and internet, one can challenge with other players in complicated games at different stages such as professional or non-professional ones. In addition, by stimulating real life in some practical applications, individuals unconsciously have to enhance their thinking skills as to be successful in this harsh competitive environment.
Another benefits obtained from growing use of technology is higher degree of creativity. It should be noted that, compared to the past, the ubiquity of various sources such as e-books and online libraries, have pave the way for acquisition a higher level of knowledge. As it is commonly perceived in every society, the more accessible source of knowledge it is, the more well-educated people will be. Therefore, via advances in technology, not only can one obtain more how-well but also the possibility for transmitting the knowledge to practical experiment, known as creativity, will be increased.
Some might argue that the massive media such as TV might hinder people's innovation. This assumption is based on this fact that TV's audiences are usually passive viewer instead of being involved in mutual interaction. This view has some flaws. Needless to say, some new channels like Discovery or some beneficial televised shows such as Quiz show have provided abysmal of data which children can use them to flourish their creativity skills.
According to what have been discussed, this is over-simplistic to say that technology can be regarded as an obstacle in human intelligence. As it was stated, various configuration of play and accessibility of knowledge are both positive technology impacts upon one's creativity.
- TPO-26 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.Use specific r 86
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 88
- TPO-28 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 75
- TPO 5 integrated writing 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'paved', 'paveed'.
Suggestion: paved; paveed
...h as e-books and online libraries, have pave the way for acquisition a higher level ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 262, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...e both positive technology impacts upon ones creativity.
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'regarding', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'as to', 'in addition', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.247572815534 0.229887763892 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.174757281553 0.158761421928 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0995145631068 0.0866891130778 115% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0412621359223 0.046263068375 89% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0291262135922 0.0685040099705 43% => OK
Prepositions: 0.126213592233 0.118717715034 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0655339805825 0.0351676179071 186% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 3.11253062008 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0339805825243 0.0309702414327 110% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0898058252427 0.0887237588012 101% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0266990291262 0.0209618222197 127% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00728155339806 0.0139019557991 52% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2360.0 2387.08602151 99% => OK
No of words: 372.0 408.028673835 91% => OK
Chars per words: 6.34408602151 5.86048508987 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48200974243 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.368279569892 0.338922669872 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.306451612903 0.251872472559 122% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.244623655914 0.174417080927 140% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.180107526882 0.112833075102 160% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11253062008 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604838709677 0.524397521467 115% => OK
Word variations: 72.5965651411 59.2087087015 123% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6684587814 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.6666666667 20.5533526081 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2953388854 48.84282405 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.111111111 120.699889404 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.5533526081 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.644075263715 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 51.311827957 45.7405998639 112% => OK
Elegance: 1.79207920792 1.45489161554 123% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230666449184 0.300154397459 77% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.091364009474 0.103427244359 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0696400035667 0.0752933317313 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.501309103898 0.497263757937 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.105937475114 0.151897553556 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869771483818 0.114077575197 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448191189802 0.0781384742642 57% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.21962187151 0.336927656856 65% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0392276261959 0.067059652881 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14177172298 0.210909579961 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548666193654 0.0618886996521 89% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8870967742 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.86379928315 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.91756272401 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 8.42114695341 142% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.4623655914 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.6433691756 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.