Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The government should support artists rather than allow them to support themselves.
As some people may hold the view that the government should advocate the artists; however, some others may hold an opposite viewpoint, and believe that there is a list of stuffs and tasks which have the priority toward the art. In addition, they need more financial supports rather than the art. I personally agree with the second belief. In the following paragraph, I will delve into the most outstanding and conspicuous factors which persuade me to put forward this perspective.
The first exquisite factor which adheres to my idea is that the unemployment is more serious stuff than the art. Unfortunately, most of the undeveloped or even well-developed countries face the unemployment issue and its negative consequence in the economic and social life. According to the noteworthy intelligible research conducted in my country, more than fifty five percent of the young people in Iran are jobless. This unemployment paves the path to other serious and out of control problem such as immoral behavior among the people and the lack of productivities. In this case, it is not a wise and cogent option to devote a big portion of the governmental economic supports on the art.
The second factor is the importance of transportation toward the art. In the country where there are the lots of far- reached villages and suburbs with the inappropriate route conditions, or there is not any sufficient public transportation system to be responsible of the in-urban conveys. It is not fair, to invest money on the artists and their art. If the public do not have these facilities to transport easily, the big exhibition of the arts advocated with the government will be meaningless. Since, people do not have this facility to go that exhibition and enjoy or capture its cultural values.
The last element which confirms the accuracy of my perspective is the importance of the education. The country which suffers from the lack of adequate training atmospheres, it will be abortive to put emphasize on the art. A vivid example can be given to shed light on the subject is my hometown's example. There are few informative schools and suitable universities allocated in my hometown; hence, a huge amount of the migration is happening in each year. Most of these migratory people are the young people who can be consider as the work-forces or future's fundamental income resources. Thus, by investing money on the education and training system, this situation can be tackled easily.
To wrap it up, all aforementioned factors and elements lead to the conclusion that there are more vital and serious tasks, which require the governmental support.
- tpo13 63
- Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.Reason: We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to 79
- The following appeared in a memo from the president of Bower Builders, a company that constructs new homes."A nationwide survey reveals that the two most-desired home features are a large family room and a large, well-appointed kitchen. A number of h 55
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The food we ate in the past was healthier than the food we eat today. 86
- The following appeared in an editorial in a business magazine."Although the sales of Whirlwind video games have declined over the past two years, a recent survey of video-game players suggests that this sales trend is about to be reversed. The survey 39
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'in addition', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.239495798319 0.229887763892 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.123949579832 0.158761421928 78% => OK
Adjectives: 0.117647058824 0.0866891130778 136% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0357142857143 0.046263068375 77% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0336134453782 0.0685040099705 49% => OK
Prepositions: 0.107142857143 0.118717715034 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0210084033613 0.0351676179071 60% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.9520442531 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0273109243697 0.0309702414327 88% => OK
Particles: 0.00210084033613 0.00188951952338 111% => OK
Determiners: 0.140756302521 0.0887237588012 159% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0189075630252 0.0209618222197 90% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0168067226891 0.0139019557991 121% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2641.0 2387.08602151 111% => OK
No of words: 436.0 408.028673835 107% => OK
Chars per words: 6.05733944954 5.86048508987 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.48200974243 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.350917431193 0.338922669872 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.284403669725 0.251872472559 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.211009174312 0.174417080927 121% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.139908256881 0.112833075102 124% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9520442531 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518348623853 0.524397521467 99% => OK
Word variations: 59.1994775866 59.2087087015 100% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6684587814 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.7619047619 20.5533526081 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6720113557 48.84282405 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.761904762 120.699889404 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7619047619 20.5533526081 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.52380952381 0.644075263715 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.54480286738 0% => OK
Readability: 49.2022717344 45.7405998639 108% => OK
Elegance: 1.90217391304 1.45489161554 131% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327353346099 0.300154397459 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0954353050342 0.103427244359 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0578598872223 0.0752933317313 77% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.585058334093 0.497263757937 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.15494943262 0.151897553556 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142977622688 0.114077575197 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050938717185 0.0781384742642 65% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.494099561429 0.336927656856 147% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.140403101415 0.067059652881 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227088396511 0.210909579961 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460251810459 0.0618886996521 74% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.86379928315 155% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.91756272401 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.42114695341 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.4623655914 162% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.6433691756 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.